Effect of Variable Priority Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Training on Cognitive and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> With advancing age, cognitive control and postural-gait regulation decline, while dual-task interference intensifies, leading to restricted mobility and increased fall risk. Variable-priority cognitive-motor dual-task training (VPDT) enhances attentional flexibility and task integration by systematically shifting attentional allocation during training. However, its effects on cognitive and physical function remain unclear. <b>Objective:</b> To review the effects of VPDT on cognitive and physical function in older adults. <b>Method:</b> A comprehensive database search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases from inception to April 2025, relevant articles were selected, data were extracted using a PICO framework and synthesized narratively. <b>Result:</b> Eight controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 284) were included. Across studies, VPDT was generally associated with improvements in functional balance and mobility outcomes, while between-group differences versus fixed-priority dual-task training (FPDT) were inconsistent. Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported (only one trial), and psychosocial outcomes were assessed in only a small subset of studies, precluding firm inferences regarding cognitive or psychosocial benefits. Overall risk of bias was predominantly "some concerns," with two studies rated "high risk," and overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate due to risk of bias, small samples, and heterogeneity in protocols and outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> VPDT may improve physical function in older adults, particularly balance and mobility, but current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent incremental advantage over FPDT. Confidence in comparative effects remains limited due to small sample sizes, risk-of-bias concerns, and heterogeneity in intervention design and outcome measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030308
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Variable Priority Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Training on Cognitive and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

R Gayatri dev, Maizatul Mardiana Harun, Xiao Yu
Brain Sciences
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Effect of Variable Priority Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Training on Cognitive and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

R Gayatri dev, Maizatul Mardiana Harun, Xiao Yu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> With advancing age, cognitive control and postural-gait regulation decline, while dual-task interference intensifies, leading to restricted mobility and increased fall risk. Variable-priority cognitive-motor dual-task training (VPDT) enhances attentional flexibility and task integration by systematically shifting attentional allocation during training. However, its effects on cognitive and physical function remain unclear. <b>Objective:</b> To review the effects of VPDT on cognitive and physical function in older adults. <b>Method:</b> A comprehensive database search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases from inception to April 2025, relevant articles were selected, data were extracted using a PICO framework and synthesized narratively. <b>Result:</b> Eight controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 284) were included. Across studies, VPDT was generally associated with improvements in functional balance and mobility outcomes, while between-group differences versus fixed-priority dual-task training (FPDT) were inconsistent. Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported (only one trial), and psychosocial outcomes were assessed in only a small subset of studies, precluding firm inferences regarding cognitive or psychosocial benefits. Overall risk of bias was predominantly "some concerns," with two studies rated "high risk," and overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate due to risk of bias, small samples, and heterogeneity in protocols and outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> VPDT may improve physical function in older adults, particularly balance and mobility, but current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent incremental advantage over FPDT. Confidence in comparative effects remains limited due to small sample sizes, risk-of-bias concerns, and heterogeneity in intervention design and outcome measurement.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(3)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.