Centralized drug procurement and inequality: Therapeutic and geographic spillovers from China's national volume-based procurement

China's National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) policy, introduced in 2018, aims to reduce pharmaceutical prices by exchanging large guaranteed purchase volumes for substantial price concessions on selected drugs. While existing research documents substantial price reductions for contracted drugs, less is known about how this selective price regulation affects pricing behavior in the broader pharmaceutical market. Using public hospital procurement data and exploiting variation in the timing of NVBP implementation, this study examines spillover effects on prices, sales quantities, and revenues of non-contracted drugs. We find that NVBP is associated with significant increases in both prices and revenues of non-contracted drugs. These effects are consistent with strategic margin reallocation by multi-product firms seeking to offset revenue losses from contracted products. Spillovers are not uniform. They are larger in chronic-disease therapeutic areas, where demand is more predictable, and substitution is limited, and in poorer regions, where market competition and regulatory capacity are weaker. Additional analyses show that spillover effects are amplified in more concentrated therapeutic markets, suggesting that market structure constrains competitive responses. The findings highlight an important trade-off in centralized procurement policies. While NVBP successfully reduces prices for targeted medicines, selective price regulation may generate unintended spillovers in the broader pharmaceutical market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119195
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centralized drug procurement and inequality: Therapeutic and geographic spillovers from China's national volume-based procurement

Tao Wang
Social Science & Medicine
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Centralized drug procurement and inequality: Therapeutic and geographic spillovers from China's national volume-based procurement

Tao Wang
article en

Abstract

China's National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) policy, introduced in 2018, aims to reduce pharmaceutical prices by exchanging large guaranteed purchase volumes for substantial price concessions on selected drugs. While existing research documents substantial price reductions for contracted drugs, less is known about how this selective price regulation affects pricing behavior in the broader pharmaceutical market. Using public hospital procurement data and exploiting variation in the timing of NVBP implementation, this study examines spillover effects on prices, sales quantities, and revenues of non-contracted drugs. We find that NVBP is associated with significant increases in both prices and revenues of non-contracted drugs. These effects are consistent with strategic margin reallocation by multi-product firms seeking to offset revenue losses from contracted products. Spillovers are not uniform. They are larger in chronic-disease therapeutic areas, where demand is more predictable, and substitution is limited, and in poorer regions, where market competition and regulatory capacity are weaker. Additional analyses show that spillover effects are amplified in more concentrated therapeutic markets, suggesting that market structure constrains competitive responses. The findings highlight an important trade-off in centralized procurement policies. While NVBP successfully reduces prices for targeted medicines, selective price regulation may generate unintended spillovers in the broader pharmaceutical market.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 398
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.