SynxFlow-based urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen

Shenzhen, located in southern Guangdong Province, is a core city within the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area in China. This study aims to assess the efficacy of SynxFlow, a newly developed open-source hydrodynamic model, by conducting an urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen across six rainfall return periods (2-, 5-, 10-, 20-, 50-, and 100-year). The research methodology employs SynxFlow's 2D hydrodynamic engine, which utilizes a Godunov-type shock-capturing scheme to solve the Shallow Water Equations (SWE) to robustly simulate complex inundation dynamics. Model validation was rigorously conducted using observed depths from six flood events and media-reported data from the “9·7 Rainstorm” event. The results demonstrate SynxFlow’s robust performance, characterized by high precision in depth estimation (average deviation < 0.04 m) and strong spatial consistency (90.24% capture rate). Comparative simulations with the widely used Lisflood-FP model showed broad agreement. Additionally, a slight systematic deviation was observed, with SynxFlow generally yielding marginally lower inundation depths than Lisflood-FP. This discrepancy, corresponding to an average bias of −0.021 m, is likely attributable to differences in the drainage modules of the two models. This study addresses a key gap in the application of the emerging SynxFlow model through a benchmark application in a high-density urban setting. Results indicated significant sensitivity to rainfall intensity: the inundated area expanded from 4.66% (2-year) to 13.74% (100-year), while the 99.5th percentile depth rose from 0.72 m to 1.88 m. Notably, the inundation extent exhibits a non-linear response to rainfall intensity, with the expansion being most rapid between 2- and 20-year return periods. Ultimately, this study underscores the critical role of integrating explicit drainage modules within open-source hydrodynamic frameworks, offering a scalable and cost-effective pathway for enhancing flood resilience planning in high-density mega-cities. • Validates SynxFlow for high-density urban flood modeling in Shenzhen. • Benchmarks SynxFlow against Lisflood-FP showing strong consistency. • Flood sensitivity follows a logarithmic trend, rising steepest at 2- to 20-year return periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103325
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SynxFlow-based urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen

Xiaodong Ming, Guisong Xia, Wei Xu, Peng Su et al.
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

SynxFlow-based urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen

Xiaodong Ming, Guisong Xia, Wei Xu, Peng Su, Zhihui Gu
article en

Abstract

Shenzhen, located in southern Guangdong Province, is a core city within the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area in China. This study aims to assess the efficacy of SynxFlow, a newly developed open-source hydrodynamic model, by conducting an urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen across six rainfall return periods (2-, 5-, 10-, 20-, 50-, and 100-year). The research methodology employs SynxFlow's 2D hydrodynamic engine, which utilizes a Godunov-type shock-capturing scheme to solve the Shallow Water Equations (SWE) to robustly simulate complex inundation dynamics. Model validation was rigorously conducted using observed depths from six flood events and media-reported data from the “9·7 Rainstorm” event. The results demonstrate SynxFlow’s robust performance, characterized by high precision in depth estimation (average deviation < 0.04 m) and strong spatial consistency (90.24% capture rate). Comparative simulations with the widely used Lisflood-FP model showed broad agreement. Additionally, a slight systematic deviation was observed, with SynxFlow generally yielding marginally lower inundation depths than Lisflood-FP. This discrepancy, corresponding to an average bias of −0.021 m, is likely attributable to differences in the drainage modules of the two models. This study addresses a key gap in the application of the emerging SynxFlow model through a benchmark application in a high-density urban setting. Results indicated significant sensitivity to rainfall intensity: the inundated area expanded from 4.66% (2-year) to 13.74% (100-year), while the 99.5th percentile depth rose from 0.72 m to 1.88 m. Notably, the inundation extent exhibits a non-linear response to rainfall intensity, with the expansion being most rapid between 2- and 20-year return periods. Ultimately, this study underscores the critical role of integrating explicit drainage modules within open-source hydrodynamic frameworks, offering a scalable and cost-effective pathway for enhancing flood resilience planning in high-density mega-cities. • Validates SynxFlow for high-density urban flood modeling in Shenzhen. • Benchmarks SynxFlow against Lisflood-FP showing strong consistency. • Flood sensitivity follows a logarithmic trend, rising steepest at 2- to 20-year return periods.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 65
Shenzhen University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Ministry of Civil Affairs (CN), Wuhan Business University (CN), Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen (China) (CN), China GreatWall Technology Group (China) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.