EXPRESS: Imperfect size invariance in face discrimination

Multiple findings suggest that human visual perception exhibit extensive size invariance (i.e., insensitivity to retinal image size changes) for multiple object categories. This is often investigated when retinal image size changes following real world image size changes but viewing distance is kept constant, a situation that does not reflect daily vision where objects retain their real-world size and their image size on the retina changes as a function of viewing distance. Here we measured face discrimination performance to parametrically growing face differences, and assessed size invariance by examining whether performance was sensitive to retinal image size changes employing multiple methods (e.g. human performance deviation from that of the ideal observer). Importantly, retinal image size changes were applied either naturalistically (when faces kept their world size but were more distant) or lab-like (where faces changed their world size while viewing distance was constant). We found that (i) the difference detection threshold (DT) was not influenced by retinal size changes or viewing distances we manipulated, (ii) face discrimination was significantly worse for smaller retinal image sizes (for both naturalistic and for lab-like conditions), (iii) worse face discrimination performance at smaller retinal image sizes were significantly associated between naturalistic and lab-like conditions. Our results indicate that face discrimination shows imperfect invariance to retinal size and importantly, this appears independent of viewing distance. Since face perception is may rely on face-specific mechanisms, future work should examine whether these results generalize to additional object categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261434960
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Imperfect size invariance in face discrimination

Olga Kreichman, Shlomit Zorani, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Face Recognition and Perception
article

EXPRESS: Imperfect size invariance in face discrimination

Olga Kreichman, Shlomit Zorani, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
article en

Abstract

Multiple findings suggest that human visual perception exhibit extensive size invariance (i.e., insensitivity to retinal image size changes) for multiple object categories. This is often investigated when retinal image size changes following real world image size changes but viewing distance is kept constant, a situation that does not reflect daily vision where objects retain their real-world size and their image size on the retina changes as a function of viewing distance. Here we measured face discrimination performance to parametrically growing face differences, and assessed size invariance by examining whether performance was sensitive to retinal image size changes employing multiple methods (e.g. human performance deviation from that of the ideal observer). Importantly, retinal image size changes were applied either naturalistically (when faces kept their world size but were more distant) or lab-like (where faces changed their world size while viewing distance was constant). We found that (i) the difference detection threshold (DT) was not influenced by retinal size changes or viewing distances we manipulated, (ii) face discrimination was significantly worse for smaller retinal image sizes (for both naturalistic and for lab-like conditions), (iii) worse face discrimination performance at smaller retinal image sizes were significantly associated between naturalistic and lab-like conditions. Our results indicate that face discrimination shows imperfect invariance to retinal size and importantly, this appears independent of viewing distance. Since face perception is may rely on face-specific mechanisms, future work should examine whether these results generalize to additional object categories.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.