The Emerging Role of Peri-Operative Methadone for the Management of Post-Operative Pain for Patients Undergoing Oesophagectomy: A Narrative Review

Background: Oesophageal cancer is a diagnosis carrying significant morbidity and mortality. Gold standard treatment is resection; however, this requires a complex operation. Despite progression to minimally invasive approaches, post-operative pain is a significant issue. Methadone is emerging as an additive intraoperative analgesic across specialities, with a single intra-operative dose seen to improve post-operative pain and reduce post-operative opioid use. This is promising for oesophagectomy patients, where pain is a significant issue; however, it remains poorly characterised. Aim: This paper aimed to assess the literature surrounding intra-operative methadone (IOM) in oesophagectomy, then broadly consider related evidence to consider how it may be applicable to patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Methods: The search assessed existing evidence for efficacy and safety of IOM for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Of 1856 studies, only one fit inclusion criteria. Following this, the search was broadened to assess IOM use in related surgical contexts, deriving applicability to oesophagectomy. Results: There is very limited evidence for IOM use in oesophagectomy. Several papers explore its use in other intraabdominal and intrathoracic procedures. This evidence may be leveraged for oesophagectomy patients. There remain several safety concerns, most notably respiratory and cardiac risks. Further, several knowledge gaps remain. Conclusions: Overall, IOM represents a promising analgesic option. Unfortunately, current evidence is limited, predominantly derived from non-generalisable studies. This paper provides an up-to-date review of evidence, highlighting clear gaps. It is clear oesophagectomy patients are a vulnerable group who would benefit from improved pain and post-operative quality of life. As such, further focused research should be done to evaluate the role of IOM in oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgeries
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries7010038
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Emerging Role of Peri-Operative Methadone for the Management of Post-Operative Pain for Patients Undergoing Oesophagectomy: A Narrative Review

Alexandra Jolley, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Charlotte Deng, Kelvin Le
Surgeries
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

The Emerging Role of Peri-Operative Methadone for the Management of Post-Operative Pain for Patients Undergoing Oesophagectomy: A Narrative Review

Alexandra Jolley, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Charlotte Deng, Kelvin Le
article en

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal cancer is a diagnosis carrying significant morbidity and mortality. Gold standard treatment is resection; however, this requires a complex operation. Despite progression to minimally invasive approaches, post-operative pain is a significant issue. Methadone is emerging as an additive intraoperative analgesic across specialities, with a single intra-operative dose seen to improve post-operative pain and reduce post-operative opioid use. This is promising for oesophagectomy patients, where pain is a significant issue; however, it remains poorly characterised. Aim: This paper aimed to assess the literature surrounding intra-operative methadone (IOM) in oesophagectomy, then broadly consider related evidence to consider how it may be applicable to patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Methods: The search assessed existing evidence for efficacy and safety of IOM for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Of 1856 studies, only one fit inclusion criteria. Following this, the search was broadened to assess IOM use in related surgical contexts, deriving applicability to oesophagectomy. Results: There is very limited evidence for IOM use in oesophagectomy. Several papers explore its use in other intraabdominal and intrathoracic procedures. This evidence may be leveraged for oesophagectomy patients. There remain several safety concerns, most notably respiratory and cardiac risks. Further, several knowledge gaps remain. Conclusions: Overall, IOM represents a promising analgesic option. Unfortunately, current evidence is limited, predominantly derived from non-generalisable studies. This paper provides an up-to-date review of evidence, highlighting clear gaps. It is clear oesophagectomy patients are a vulnerable group who would benefit from improved pain and post-operative quality of life. As such, further focused research should be done to evaluate the role of IOM in oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

SurgeriesVol. 7(1)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.