Modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score as a New Risk-Stratification Tool in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Systemic inflammatory markers are increasingly recognized as prognostic indicators in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), demonstrating significant associations with survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Aarhus composite biomarker score (ACBS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and to introduce the modified ACBS as a laboratory-based prognostic tool in mCRC. <b>Methods</b>: The Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score was calculated using serum albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and hemoglobin levels. The modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score-1 (mACBS-1) stratified patients into three prognostic groups: favorable, intermediate, and poor risk. The simplified modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score-2 (mACBS-2) categorized patients into two prognostic groups (low vs. high risk). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. <b>Results</b>: The median overall survival (OS) was 35 months (95% CI: 29.38-40.62). Stratification by mACBS-1 revealed median OS values of 47, 30, and 14 months for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Similarly, mACBS-2 distinguished two prognostic groups, with median OS of 47 months in the favorable-risk group and 30 months in the poor-risk group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, ACBS remained an independent predictor of overall survival, with three abnormal biomarkers conferring a significantly increased mortality risk (HR 4.61, 95% CI 2.17-9.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, poor-risk classification by mACBS-1 (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.58-7.12, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and mACBS-2 (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.29-3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.002) was independently associated with worse survival. <b>Conclusions</b>: The ACBS and its modified versions (mACBS-1 and mACBS-2) are simple, laboratory-based prognostic tools with independent predictive value for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. Its clinical use may support improved risk stratification and individualized patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16060863
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score as a New Risk-Stratification Tool in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Mustafa Şahbazlar, Nagihan Kolkıran, Atike Pınar Erdoğan, Ferhat Ekinci
Diagnostics
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score as a New Risk-Stratification Tool in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Mustafa Şahbazlar, Nagihan Kolkıran, Atike Pınar Erdoğan, Ferhat Ekinci
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Systemic inflammatory markers are increasingly recognized as prognostic indicators in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), demonstrating significant associations with survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Aarhus composite biomarker score (ACBS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and to introduce the modified ACBS as a laboratory-based prognostic tool in mCRC. <b>Methods</b>: The Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score was calculated using serum albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and hemoglobin levels. The modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score-1 (mACBS-1) stratified patients into three prognostic groups: favorable, intermediate, and poor risk. The simplified modified Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score-2 (mACBS-2) categorized patients into two prognostic groups (low vs. high risk). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. <b>Results</b>: The median overall survival (OS) was 35 months (95% CI: 29.38-40.62). Stratification by mACBS-1 revealed median OS values of 47, 30, and 14 months for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Similarly, mACBS-2 distinguished two prognostic groups, with median OS of 47 months in the favorable-risk group and 30 months in the poor-risk group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, ACBS remained an independent predictor of overall survival, with three abnormal biomarkers conferring a significantly increased mortality risk (HR 4.61, 95% CI 2.17-9.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, poor-risk classification by mACBS-1 (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.58-7.12, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and mACBS-2 (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.29-3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.002) was independently associated with worse survival. <b>Conclusions</b>: The ACBS and its modified versions (mACBS-1 and mACBS-2) are simple, laboratory-based prognostic tools with independent predictive value for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. Its clinical use may support improved risk stratification and individualized patient management.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(6)
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.