Simulation training for invasive cardiovascular procedures: the Heart-SIMS-1 randomized trial

Interventional cardiology training has a long learning curve, with potential procedural risks to patients and clinicians. We aimed to assess whether mentored simulation-based training with 3D-printed models can improve the skills of beginners in coronary diagnostic procedures in a pilot randomized trial. Twenty-nine final-year medical students recruited from a single University were lectured on the fundamentals of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for one-hour, and then randomized to conventional or simulation training. Conventional training (n = 15) consisted of watching a 20-minute video demonstrating ICA steps performed in a 3D-printed coronary simulator. The simulation training group (n = 14) were offered, in pairs, the same content in a 20-minute hands-on session using a 3D-printed simulator. The co-primary endpoint was efficacy and safety of performing a simulated ICA in the angiography suite. Efficacy and safety were graded using a 13-point procedural checklist (0-100%) and the identification of five procedural “red flags” items, respectively. The secondary endpoint was theoretical knowledge (multiple-choice test). All participants completed the protocol. In both components of the co-primary endpoint, the simulation group scored higher: efficacy score of 91.5 ± 3.8% vs. 64.6 ± 8.3% (mean difference 95% CI [20.8, 30.8]) and safety score 100.0% (100.0-100.0%) vs. 62.5 (20.8–79.2%) (median difference 95% CI [20.8, 79.2]), p < 0.001. The median number of “red flags” were 2 (1–4) in conventional and 0 (0–0) in simulation training (p < 0.001). Also, simulation group obtained a higher score in the theoretical knowledge test: 85.7 ± 9.0% vs. 76.8 ± 12.7%, p = 0.039. Mentored simulation-based training using 3D-printed simulators significantly improved theoretical knowledge and basic procedural skills of ICA. These results suggest that simulation-based training should be pursued for improving patient safety and technical proficiency. NCT06224101.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08831-6
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation training for invasive cardiovascular procedures: the Heart-SIMS-1 randomized trial

Jorge Guardado, Lino Gonçalves, Richard Bogle, J Borges-Rosa et al.
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Simulation training for invasive cardiovascular procedures: the Heart-SIMS-1 randomized trial

Jorge Guardado, Lino Gonçalves, Richard Bogle, J Borges-Rosa, Arif Khokhar, Marco A. Costa, Gustavo Pires-Morais, Manuel Oliveira-Santos, Ana Vera Marinho, Bárbara Lobo, Eduardo Oliveira Santos, Dariusz Dudek, Cláudio Guerreiro, João Silva Marques
article en

Abstract

Interventional cardiology training has a long learning curve, with potential procedural risks to patients and clinicians. We aimed to assess whether mentored simulation-based training with 3D-printed models can improve the skills of beginners in coronary diagnostic procedures in a pilot randomized trial. Twenty-nine final-year medical students recruited from a single University were lectured on the fundamentals of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for one-hour, and then randomized to conventional or simulation training. Conventional training (n = 15) consisted of watching a 20-minute video demonstrating ICA steps performed in a 3D-printed coronary simulator. The simulation training group (n = 14) were offered, in pairs, the same content in a 20-minute hands-on session using a 3D-printed simulator. The co-primary endpoint was efficacy and safety of performing a simulated ICA in the angiography suite. Efficacy and safety were graded using a 13-point procedural checklist (0-100%) and the identification of five procedural “red flags” items, respectively. The secondary endpoint was theoretical knowledge (multiple-choice test). All participants completed the protocol. In both components of the co-primary endpoint, the simulation group scored higher: efficacy score of 91.5 ± 3.8% vs. 64.6 ± 8.3% (mean difference 95% CI [20.8, 30.8]) and safety score 100.0% (100.0-100.0%) vs. 62.5 (20.8–79.2%) (median difference 95% CI [20.8, 79.2]), p < 0.001. The median number of “red flags” were 2 (1–4) in conventional and 0 (0–0) in simulation training (p < 0.001). Also, simulation group obtained a higher score in the theoretical knowledge test: 85.7 ± 9.0% vs. 76.8 ± 12.7%, p = 0.039. Mentored simulation-based training using 3D-printed simulators significantly improved theoretical knowledge and basic procedural skills of ICA. These results suggest that simulation-based training should be pursued for improving patient safety and technical proficiency. NCT06224101.

BMC Medical Education
Jagiellonian University (PL), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra (PT), Universidade Politécnica da Guarda (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Institute of Cardiology (PL), Emergent BioSolutions (Canada) (CA), Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.