Genghis Khan Shark Optimizer for multi-objective mechanical truss design

Mechanical structures in engineering are increasingly designed under stringent requirements for low-weight, high-stiffness, and safety, making multi-objective structural optimization central to innovative, cost-effective-products. This work introduces two multi-objective variants of the Genghis Khan Shark Optimizer (GKSO) for structural design. Both retain GKSO’s four phases-hunting, moving, foraging, and self-protection-while differing in how convergence and diversity are managed. MOGKSO-I follows NSGAII-principles: external Pareto archive is maintained, leaders for guidance are drawn by roulette with probabilities proportional to crowding-distance, replacements use Pareto dominance with probabilistic tie-acceptance, objective normalization and a light bounded differential mutation stabilize search and curb stagnation. MOGKSO-II adopts a MOPSO-style adaptive grid: the archive is governed by grid-occupancy without pairwise dominance, leaders are sampled from sparse cells, acceptance favors candidates that populate less-crowded cells, with a weak tie-break toward the ideal and occasional random admits for exploration. The variants are evaluated against competitive algorithms on CEC’20 benchmarks, representative constrained engineering designs, and large-scale truss structures using indicators (IGDX/IGDF, HV, PSP, STE). Results show competitive hypervolume and spread, well-distributed Pareto sets, and lighter feasible designs under stress and displacement limits, with complementary strengths: MOGKSO-I exhibits stronger convergence on smooth fronts, whereas MOGKSO-II excels at preserving diversity on irregular or disconnected fronts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Control and Optimization
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2026.100688
Primary Topic
Topology Optimization in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genghis Khan Shark Optimizer for multi-objective mechanical truss design

Siham Ouhimmou, David Bassir, Fatima Daqaq, Ghanshyam G. Tejani
Results in Control and Optimization
Topology Optimization in Engineering
article

Genghis Khan Shark Optimizer for multi-objective mechanical truss design

Siham Ouhimmou, David Bassir, Fatima Daqaq, Ghanshyam G. Tejani
article en

Abstract

Mechanical structures in engineering are increasingly designed under stringent requirements for low-weight, high-stiffness, and safety, making multi-objective structural optimization central to innovative, cost-effective-products. This work introduces two multi-objective variants of the Genghis Khan Shark Optimizer (GKSO) for structural design. Both retain GKSO’s four phases-hunting, moving, foraging, and self-protection-while differing in how convergence and diversity are managed. MOGKSO-I follows NSGAII-principles: external Pareto archive is maintained, leaders for guidance are drawn by roulette with probabilities proportional to crowding-distance, replacements use Pareto dominance with probabilistic tie-acceptance, objective normalization and a light bounded differential mutation stabilize search and curb stagnation. MOGKSO-II adopts a MOPSO-style adaptive grid: the archive is governed by grid-occupancy without pairwise dominance, leaders are sampled from sparse cells, acceptance favors candidates that populate less-crowded cells, with a weak tie-break toward the ideal and occasional random admits for exploration. The variants are evaluated against competitive algorithms on CEC’20 benchmarks, representative constrained engineering designs, and large-scale truss structures using indicators (IGDX/IGDF, HV, PSP, STE). Results show competitive hypervolume and spread, well-distributed Pareto sets, and lighter feasible designs under stress and displacement limits, with complementary strengths: MOGKSO-I exhibits stronger convergence on smooth fronts, whereas MOGKSO-II excels at preserving diversity on irregular or disconnected fronts.

Results in Control and OptimizationVol. 23
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Dongguan University of Technology (CN), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Saveetha University (IN), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA), Yuan Ze University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Topology Optimization in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.