Pay Gap Matters: Evidence from Bank Liquidity Creation

Using data on publicly traded U.S. bank holding companies from 1992 to 2019, we examine whether disparities between CEO and non-CEO executive pay affect banks’ liquidity creation. We find that banks with larger CEO pay gaps create more liquidity, but this positive association emerges only after the global financial crisis. A difference-in-differences analysis around the 2011 implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act corroborates these findings: the interaction between post-2011 and the pay-gap measures is positive and significant, implying that post-crisis compensation and governance reforms strengthened the incentive role of pay inequality. The effect is concentrated in on-balance-sheet liquidity creation and in banks with stronger risk-absorbing capacity, low market competition, and sound governance. Together, the results reveal a dynamic link between executive pay structure and bank behavior, suggesting that post-crisis reforms amplified the motivational channel of pay disparity while overly restrictive pay limits could unintentionally dampen banks’ liquidity-creation capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Services Research
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-025-00460-2
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pay Gap Matters: Evidence from Bank Liquidity Creation

Kwabena A. Addo, Chen Zheng, Mamiza Haq, Adrian Wai Kong Cheung et al.
Journal of Financial Services Research
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Pay Gap Matters: Evidence from Bank Liquidity Creation

Kwabena A. Addo, Chen Zheng, Mamiza Haq, Adrian Wai Kong Cheung, Shams Pathan
article en

Abstract

Using data on publicly traded U.S. bank holding companies from 1992 to 2019, we examine whether disparities between CEO and non-CEO executive pay affect banks’ liquidity creation. We find that banks with larger CEO pay gaps create more liquidity, but this positive association emerges only after the global financial crisis. A difference-in-differences analysis around the 2011 implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act corroborates these findings: the interaction between post-2011 and the pay-gap measures is positive and significant, implying that post-crisis compensation and governance reforms strengthened the incentive role of pay inequality. The effect is concentrated in on-balance-sheet liquidity creation and in banks with stronger risk-absorbing capacity, low market competition, and sound governance. Together, the results reveal a dynamic link between executive pay structure and bank behavior, suggesting that post-crisis reforms amplified the motivational channel of pay disparity while overly restrictive pay limits could unintentionally dampen banks’ liquidity-creation capacity.

Journal of Financial Services Research
Curtin University (AU), City University of Macau (MO), Newcastle University (GB), ESSCA School of Management (FR), German University in Cairo (EG)
Swansea University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pay Gap Matters: Evidence from Bank Liquidity Creation — Kwabena A. Addo, Chen Zheng, et al. · Journal of Financial Services Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS