Embracing Generative AI in Construction through a Quantitative Analysis and Weighted Score Ranking of Perceptions, Applications, and Complexities

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as generative pretrained transformer–based language models gain prominence, the construction industry faces adoption challenges that differ from deterministic tools. Generative AI (GenAI) is probabilistic, multifunctional, and cognitively demanding, requiring prompting skills, interpretability, and data governance—factors not fully captured by traditional technology acceptance model (TAM) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) applications. Addressing this gap, this study assesses how US construction professionals perceive both the benefits and complexities of GenAI, identifies which applications they prioritize, and segments adoption profiles across the workforce. A nationwide survey of 97 companies revealed three benefit dimensions—Real-Time Construction Intelligence, Regulatory and Analytical Automation, and Design Acceleration and Enhancement—and three complexity dimensions—Organizational and Change Management, Data and Customization, and Integration and Cultural Alignment—through exploratory factor analysis. Weighted ranking placed Design Time Reduction, Building Information Model (BIM) Enhancement, Risk Assessment Support, Real-Time Cost Control, and Site-Safety Monitoring as top benefits, while Risk Assessment Challenges, Organizational Data Availability, and Real-Time Deployment emerged as leading barriers. Benefits were rated 11.53 points higher than complexities [t(96)=12.98, p<0.001; d=1.318] and were positively correlated (r=0.613, p<0.001). Cluster analysis revealed four perception profiles, with the most critical being training moderated polarization and highly familiar users. Theoretically, the findings refine TAM/UTAUT by showing that usefulness manifests as decision support, analytical automation, and design acceleration, while ease of use depends on interpretability, organizational readiness, and role alignment. Practically, firms should begin with a governed retrieval layer that enables GenAI to cite project sources, complement it with role-based prompt-and-verify training, and pilot bounded tasks under human review before scaling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-17444
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing Generative AI in Construction through a Quantitative Analysis and Weighted Score Ranking of Perceptions, Applications, and Complexities

Cristián Gaedicke, Hooman Sadeh, Farzad Shahbodaghlou, Ruichuan Zhang et al.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Embracing Generative AI in Construction through a Quantitative Analysis and Weighted Score Ranking of Perceptions, Applications, and Complexities

Cristián Gaedicke, Hooman Sadeh, Farzad Shahbodaghlou, Ruichuan Zhang, Dimitar Todorov, Min Jae Lee
article en

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as generative pretrained transformer–based language models gain prominence, the construction industry faces adoption challenges that differ from deterministic tools. Generative AI (GenAI) is probabilistic, multifunctional, and cognitively demanding, requiring prompting skills, interpretability, and data governance—factors not fully captured by traditional technology acceptance model (TAM) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) applications. Addressing this gap, this study assesses how US construction professionals perceive both the benefits and complexities of GenAI, identifies which applications they prioritize, and segments adoption profiles across the workforce. A nationwide survey of 97 companies revealed three benefit dimensions—Real-Time Construction Intelligence, Regulatory and Analytical Automation, and Design Acceleration and Enhancement—and three complexity dimensions—Organizational and Change Management, Data and Customization, and Integration and Cultural Alignment—through exploratory factor analysis. Weighted ranking placed Design Time Reduction, Building Information Model (BIM) Enhancement, Risk Assessment Support, Real-Time Cost Control, and Site-Safety Monitoring as top benefits, while Risk Assessment Challenges, Organizational Data Availability, and Real-Time Deployment emerged as leading barriers. Benefits were rated 11.53 points higher than complexities [t(96)=12.98, p<0.001; d=1.318] and were positively correlated (r=0.613, p<0.001). Cluster analysis revealed four perception profiles, with the most critical being training moderated polarization and highly familiar users. Theoretically, the findings refine TAM/UTAUT by showing that usefulness manifests as decision support, analytical automation, and design acceleration, while ease of use depends on interpretability, organizational readiness, and role alignment. Practically, firms should begin with a governed retrieval layer that enables GenAI to cite project sources, complement it with role-based prompt-and-verify training, and pilot bounded tasks under human review before scaling.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 152(5)
Utica College (US), California State University System (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.