Comparative Study between Alvarado Scoring System and Ripasa Scoring System in Acute Appendicitis

Abstract Background & Objectives -Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring emergency surgical intervention. Despite advancements in imaging techniques, clinical scoring systems such as the Alvarado Scoring System and the RIPASA Scoring System remain essential diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value, sensitivity, and specificity of the Alvarado and RIPASA Scoring Systems in patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain suspected of acute appendicitis. Materials & Methods: This hospital-based observational study was conducted at Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences over 18 months (May 2023 – October 2024). A total of 170 patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain were included. Patients were assessed using both the Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems, and their scores were compared with histopathological confirmation of appendicitis. Statistical analysis was performed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each scoring system. Results: The study revealed that the RIPASA Score demonstrated higher sensitivity (94%) compared to the Alvarado Score (72.8%), indicating better diagnostic accuracy. The specificity of the RIPASA Score was 88%, whereas the Alvarado Score had a specificity of 100%, suggesting that Alvarado is more effective in ruling out non-appendicitis cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for both scores was 100%, meaning that a high score reliably indicated appendicitis, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was higher for RIPASA (90.7%) than for Alvarado (70.5%), indicating that RIPASA is more effective in identifying true-negative cases. Conclusion: This study confirms that the RIPASA Score is superior to the Alvarado Score in diagnosing acute appendicitis, particularly in Asian populations, due to its higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. However, the Alvarado Score remains a valuable tool, particularly for ruling out non-appendicitis cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18996801
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Alvarado Scoring System and Ripasa Scoring System in Acute Appendicitis

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Comparative Study between Alvarado Scoring System and Ripasa Scoring System in Acute Appendicitis

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background & Objectives -Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring emergency surgical intervention. Despite advancements in imaging techniques, clinical scoring systems such as the Alvarado Scoring System and the RIPASA Scoring System remain essential diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value, sensitivity, and specificity of the Alvarado and RIPASA Scoring Systems in patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain suspected of acute appendicitis. Materials & Methods: This hospital-based observational study was conducted at Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences over 18 months (May 2023 – October 2024). A total of 170 patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain were included. Patients were assessed using both the Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems, and their scores were compared with histopathological confirmation of appendicitis. Statistical analysis was performed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each scoring system. Results: The study revealed that the RIPASA Score demonstrated higher sensitivity (94%) compared to the Alvarado Score (72.8%), indicating better diagnostic accuracy. The specificity of the RIPASA Score was 88%, whereas the Alvarado Score had a specificity of 100%, suggesting that Alvarado is more effective in ruling out non-appendicitis cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for both scores was 100%, meaning that a high score reliably indicated appendicitis, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was higher for RIPASA (90.7%) than for Alvarado (70.5%), indicating that RIPASA is more effective in identifying true-negative cases. Conclusion: This study confirms that the RIPASA Score is superior to the Alvarado Score in diagnosing acute appendicitis, particularly in Asian populations, due to its higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. However, the Alvarado Score remains a valuable tool, particularly for ruling out non-appendicitis cases.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Pharma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.