Citizen science provides insights on pollination services in urban community gardens

Urban community gardens are collectively managed (agro)ecosystems shaped by diverse gardening practices that influence both planned and associated biodiversity. Yet, biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services in these gardens remain underexplored, and gardeners are rarely engaged as collaborators in scientific research. In this study, we investigated how bee diversity and urbanization factors affect pollination services, measured by the fruit set of common garden crops under real-world gardening conditions. Additionally, we examined participation dynamics within our citizen science approach and explored their relationship with the collected data as well as participants-reported challenges such as poor plant health. We collaborated with 73 gardeners in 22 gardens in Berlin and Munich, Germany, to measure the fruit set of 150 crops, mainly from the families Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae. In parallel, researchers conducted systematic bee observations and quantified urbanization factors such as air temperature and surrounding imperviousness. We found a significant positive interaction between bee species richness and landscape imperviousness for the fruit set of Cucurbitaceae, emphasizing the importance of species-rich bee communities for pollination services in urban gardens. In contrast, no significant environmental predictors explained the fruit set of the Solanaceae group. Instead, we found that differences in sampling frequency led to significant differences in fruit set measurements, suggesting that self-pollination or an observer bias may contribute to variability. Participation types (differing in duration and frequency of data collection) were not affected by plant health issues or difficulties with the protocol, indicating that participant engagement in this real-world citizen science project was robust to practical challenges. Our findings highlight the potential of diverse bee communities to mitigate negative effects of urbanization on crop productivity in urban community gardens and demonstrate the value of citizen science for pollination research. Future citizen science approaches should balance scientific accuracy with participant autonomy, for instance, by coordinating crop selection or fostering a systematic recording of management practices. Key lessons learned include involving target groups early in project design and ensuring clear communication of data quality standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-026-02507-x
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizen science provides insights on pollination services in urban community gardens

Ulrike Sturm, Aaron N. Sexton, Susan Karlebowski, Astrid E. Neumann et al.
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Plant and animal studies
article

Citizen science provides insights on pollination services in urban community gardens

Ulrike Sturm, Aaron N. Sexton, Susan Karlebowski, Astrid E. Neumann, Monika Egerer, Julia M. Schmack
article en

Abstract

Urban community gardens are collectively managed (agro)ecosystems shaped by diverse gardening practices that influence both planned and associated biodiversity. Yet, biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services in these gardens remain underexplored, and gardeners are rarely engaged as collaborators in scientific research. In this study, we investigated how bee diversity and urbanization factors affect pollination services, measured by the fruit set of common garden crops under real-world gardening conditions. Additionally, we examined participation dynamics within our citizen science approach and explored their relationship with the collected data as well as participants-reported challenges such as poor plant health. We collaborated with 73 gardeners in 22 gardens in Berlin and Munich, Germany, to measure the fruit set of 150 crops, mainly from the families Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae. In parallel, researchers conducted systematic bee observations and quantified urbanization factors such as air temperature and surrounding imperviousness. We found a significant positive interaction between bee species richness and landscape imperviousness for the fruit set of Cucurbitaceae, emphasizing the importance of species-rich bee communities for pollination services in urban gardens. In contrast, no significant environmental predictors explained the fruit set of the Solanaceae group. Instead, we found that differences in sampling frequency led to significant differences in fruit set measurements, suggesting that self-pollination or an observer bias may contribute to variability. Participation types (differing in duration and frequency of data collection) were not affected by plant health issues or difficulties with the protocol, indicating that participant engagement in this real-world citizen science project was robust to practical challenges. Our findings highlight the potential of diverse bee communities to mitigate negative effects of urbanization on crop productivity in urban community gardens and demonstrate the value of citizen science for pollination research. Future citizen science approaches should balance scientific accuracy with participant autonomy, for instance, by coordinating crop selection or fostering a systematic recording of management practices. Key lessons learned include involving target groups early in project design and ensuring clear communication of data quality standards.

BMC Ecology and EvolutionVol. 26(1)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Cornell University (US), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.