Mediation of Treatment Effects in Problem-Focused Social Skills Training versus Resource Activation for Children with Disruptive Behavior Problems: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

A previous randomized controlled trial comparing problem-focused computer-assisted skills training (ScouT) with supportive resource activation treatment (STARK) in children (6-12 years) with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) demonstrated significant pre-post changes in both treatment conditions, with ScouT being slightly superior on some outcomes. Based on the same sample (N = 99), the present study examined cross-sectional indirect associations between treatment condition and outcomes via intermediate variables, which conceptually correspond to mediation. We hypothesized that ScouT would lead to stronger reductions in the peer-related aggression-maintaining factor (PAM factor; including dysfunctional social information processing, emotional dysregulation, impulse control problems, deficits in social skills, and dysfunctional social interactions), whereas STARK would lead to greater improvements in self-concept, which in turn would be associated with lower concurrently assessed clinician-, parent- and teacher-rated DBD symptoms and overall externalizing behaviors. Our analysis yielded support for the hypothesized indirect association through the PAM factor, with consistency across all outcome measures. Unexpectedly, compared with STARK, ScouT also led to a more favorable self-concept, which was indirectly associated with less severe clinician-rated DBD symptoms, but not with the other outcomes. This latter indirect association was small and should additionally be interpreted with caution given the low reliability of the clinician-rated scale. These findings may indicate that the treatment of children with DBD may benefit from directly targeting aggression-maintaining factors. Limitations include the concurrent assessment of the intermediate variables (PAM factor, self-concept) and the outcomes, which does not permit causal conclusions. Future research should refine methodologies and explore additional treatment mechanisms.Trial Registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 2014-05-18 (Identifier: NCT02143427).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01999-4
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mediation of Treatment Effects in Problem-Focused Social Skills Training versus Resource Activation for Children with Disruptive Behavior Problems: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Leonie Hofmann, Christina Dose, Manfred Döpfner, Anja Görtz-Dorten
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Mediation of Treatment Effects in Problem-Focused Social Skills Training versus Resource Activation for Children with Disruptive Behavior Problems: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Leonie Hofmann, Christina Dose, Manfred Döpfner, Anja Görtz-Dorten
article en

Abstract

A previous randomized controlled trial comparing problem-focused computer-assisted skills training (ScouT) with supportive resource activation treatment (STARK) in children (6-12 years) with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) demonstrated significant pre-post changes in both treatment conditions, with ScouT being slightly superior on some outcomes. Based on the same sample (N = 99), the present study examined cross-sectional indirect associations between treatment condition and outcomes via intermediate variables, which conceptually correspond to mediation. We hypothesized that ScouT would lead to stronger reductions in the peer-related aggression-maintaining factor (PAM factor; including dysfunctional social information processing, emotional dysregulation, impulse control problems, deficits in social skills, and dysfunctional social interactions), whereas STARK would lead to greater improvements in self-concept, which in turn would be associated with lower concurrently assessed clinician-, parent- and teacher-rated DBD symptoms and overall externalizing behaviors. Our analysis yielded support for the hypothesized indirect association through the PAM factor, with consistency across all outcome measures. Unexpectedly, compared with STARK, ScouT also led to a more favorable self-concept, which was indirectly associated with less severe clinician-rated DBD symptoms, but not with the other outcomes. This latter indirect association was small and should additionally be interpreted with caution given the low reliability of the clinician-rated scale. These findings may indicate that the treatment of children with DBD may benefit from directly targeting aggression-maintaining factors. Limitations include the concurrent assessment of the intermediate variables (PAM factor, self-concept) and the outcomes, which does not permit causal conclusions. Future research should refine methodologies and explore additional treatment mechanisms.Trial Registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 2014-05-18 (Identifier: NCT02143427).

Child Psychiatry & Human Development
University of Cologne (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.