Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability analysis of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) varieties using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in Amahara Region, Northwest Ethiopia

Durum wheat is a staple crop for over one- third of the global population; however, its production in Ethiopia, particularly in the Amhara Region, faces major challenges due to limited adaptable varieties, poor management practices, and environmental constraints. Newly released wheat varieties often fail in unfamiliar environments, leading to yield losses. To address this issue, a study was conducted to evaluate the adaptability, performance, and yield stability of recently released high-performing durum wheat cultivars in the Amahara region. The field trials were conducted over two consecutive years (2022/2023 and 2023/2024) at three districts; Simada, Bichena, and Dabat, using a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Data were collected on main agronomic traits, including growth, phenological, and yield traits such as grain yield. Statistical analyses included SAS 9.4 and R software were used, showing significant differences in crop phenological stages, growth, and yield parameters across years and locations for tested traits. Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction(AMMI) and Genotype and Genotype × Environment (GGE) biplot analysis were used to study genotype by environmental interaction(GEI). Genotype, location, and year interactions significantly influenced all durum wheat genotypes. The combined analysis of variance for all tested traits including grain yield, showed highly significant effects (p < 0.001). Grain yield ranged from 4.5 t ha-1in Dabat to 2.29 t ha-1in Simada. Among the genotypes, Tesfaye had the highest mean yield (3.74 t ha-1), while Wehabit had the lowest (2.75 t ha-1). The AMMI analysis revealed that most of the variation was due to environment (45%), followed by genotype (16%) and genotype × environment interaction (16%), showing strong environmental influence on yield performance. The GGE biplot and AMMI analysis identified Tesfaye and Don metteo as stable genotypes, while Simada and Bichena as representative environments. This study identifies Tesfaye as the most productive and stable wheat variety in the study area and suggests farmers should adopt it to increase wheat yield per unit area of land.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342401
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability analysis of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) varieties using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in Amahara Region, Northwest Ethiopia

Mulugeta Aytenew, Yohannes Azene, Kelemu Nakachew, Alamir Ayenew et al.
PLoS ONE
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability analysis of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) varieties using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in Amahara Region, Northwest Ethiopia

Mulugeta Aytenew, Yohannes Azene, Kelemu Nakachew, Alamir Ayenew, Alemnesh Eskezia
article en

Abstract

Durum wheat is a staple crop for over one- third of the global population; however, its production in Ethiopia, particularly in the Amhara Region, faces major challenges due to limited adaptable varieties, poor management practices, and environmental constraints. Newly released wheat varieties often fail in unfamiliar environments, leading to yield losses. To address this issue, a study was conducted to evaluate the adaptability, performance, and yield stability of recently released high-performing durum wheat cultivars in the Amahara region. The field trials were conducted over two consecutive years (2022/2023 and 2023/2024) at three districts; Simada, Bichena, and Dabat, using a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Data were collected on main agronomic traits, including growth, phenological, and yield traits such as grain yield. Statistical analyses included SAS 9.4 and R software were used, showing significant differences in crop phenological stages, growth, and yield parameters across years and locations for tested traits. Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction(AMMI) and Genotype and Genotype × Environment (GGE) biplot analysis were used to study genotype by environmental interaction(GEI). Genotype, location, and year interactions significantly influenced all durum wheat genotypes. The combined analysis of variance for all tested traits including grain yield, showed highly significant effects (p < 0.001). Grain yield ranged from 4.5 t ha-1in Dabat to 2.29 t ha-1in Simada. Among the genotypes, Tesfaye had the highest mean yield (3.74 t ha-1), while Wehabit had the lowest (2.75 t ha-1). The AMMI analysis revealed that most of the variation was due to environment (45%), followed by genotype (16%) and genotype × environment interaction (16%), showing strong environmental influence on yield performance. The GGE biplot and AMMI analysis identified Tesfaye and Don metteo as stable genotypes, while Simada and Bichena as representative environments. This study identifies Tesfaye as the most productive and stable wheat variety in the study area and suggests farmers should adopt it to increase wheat yield per unit area of land.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET), University of Gondar (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.