Assessing the robustness of AI lesion risk scores at different exposure settings using an anthropomorphic breast phantom

To assess the robustness of risk scores provided by an artificial intelligence (AI) system for digital mammography (DM), when varying the exposure conditions. An anthropomorphic breast phantom containing a lesion, was imaged with DM at different tube voltages (kV), tube loadings (mAs), and anode/filter combinations (W/Rh, Mo/Mo, and Mo/Rh). The organ doses were extracted from the DICOM header and used as a substitute for average glandular dose. The images were analyzed with an AI system, which provided a lesion risk score which translates to suspicion for malignancy. Correlations between the lesion risk score and the exposure conditions were investigated. In most imaging conditions, weak to moderately strong positive associations between lesion risk scores and kV and mAs, respectively, were reported (varying by anode/filter combinations). When organ dose increased the AI risk scores plateaued, and further increase did not increase the lesion risk score. For typical clinical settings (W/Rh, 27 kV and 71 mAs) the range of lesion risk scores was 33-56 (mean: 42, SD: 9). Greatest reported variability (range: 36-63, mean: 51, SD: 12) was found at 27 kV and 36 mAs (using W/Rh). Images of suboptimal quality may result in inaccurate AI system performance. The unexpectedly large intra-group variability of AI risk scores should be further investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf166
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the robustness of AI lesion risk scores at different exposure settings using an anthropomorphic breast phantom

Magnus Dustler, Anna Bjerkén, Pontus Timberg, Victor Dahlblom et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Assessing the robustness of AI lesion risk scores at different exposure settings using an anthropomorphic breast phantom

Magnus Dustler, Anna Bjerkén, Pontus Timberg, Victor Dahlblom, Anders Tingberg, L Alström
article en

Abstract

To assess the robustness of risk scores provided by an artificial intelligence (AI) system for digital mammography (DM), when varying the exposure conditions. An anthropomorphic breast phantom containing a lesion, was imaged with DM at different tube voltages (kV), tube loadings (mAs), and anode/filter combinations (W/Rh, Mo/Mo, and Mo/Rh). The organ doses were extracted from the DICOM header and used as a substitute for average glandular dose. The images were analyzed with an AI system, which provided a lesion risk score which translates to suspicion for malignancy. Correlations between the lesion risk score and the exposure conditions were investigated. In most imaging conditions, weak to moderately strong positive associations between lesion risk scores and kV and mAs, respectively, were reported (varying by anode/filter combinations). When organ dose increased the AI risk scores plateaued, and further increase did not increase the lesion risk score. For typical clinical settings (W/Rh, 27 kV and 71 mAs) the range of lesion risk scores was 33-56 (mean: 42, SD: 9). Greatest reported variability (range: 36-63, mean: 51, SD: 12) was found at 27 kV and 36 mAs (using W/Rh). Images of suboptimal quality may result in inaccurate AI system performance. The unexpectedly large intra-group variability of AI risk scores should be further investigated.

Radiation Protection DosimetryVol. 202(3–4)
Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.