Effect of antidiabetic medication adherence on risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes patients: Impact of antidiabetic adherence on cardiovascular disease

This retrospective cohort study aims to examine the association between adherence to thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy and the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with utilization of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sulfonylureas (SUs), using real-world national data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2009-2018). Two matched cohorts were established: TZDs versus DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 7875) and TZDs versus SUs (n = 5837). Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered during the first year, with high adherence defined as proportion of days covered ≥0.8. Outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, CV death, hospitalization for heart failure, major adverse CV events, and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were applied using intention-to-treat and adherence-stratified analyses. At 12 months, DPP-4 inhibitor users demonstrated higher adherence and persistence compared to the TZD users, whereas adherence was comparable between TZD and SU users. In cohort 1, TZD therapy was associated with increased risks of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.23) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. In cohort 2, TZDs were associated with lower risks of myocardial infarction (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99), major adverse CV events (HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95), hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.93) compared with SUs. High adherence to TZDs was consistently associated with more favorable CV and survival outcomes, in comparison to SUs. In this nationwide cohort, TZD therapy, especially with high adherence, reduced CV risk and mortality compared with SUs and DPP-4 inhibitors, highlighting the importance of sustained TZD adherence for optimal long-term outcomes in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048016
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of antidiabetic medication adherence on risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes patients: Impact of antidiabetic adherence on cardiovascular disease

Da Hea Seo, Dae Jung Kim, So Hun Kim, Kyoung Hwa Ha
Medicine
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Effect of antidiabetic medication adherence on risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes patients: Impact of antidiabetic adherence on cardiovascular disease

Da Hea Seo, Dae Jung Kim, So Hun Kim, Kyoung Hwa Ha
article en

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aims to examine the association between adherence to thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy and the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with utilization of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sulfonylureas (SUs), using real-world national data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2009-2018). Two matched cohorts were established: TZDs versus DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 7875) and TZDs versus SUs (n = 5837). Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered during the first year, with high adherence defined as proportion of days covered ≥0.8. Outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, CV death, hospitalization for heart failure, major adverse CV events, and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were applied using intention-to-treat and adherence-stratified analyses. At 12 months, DPP-4 inhibitor users demonstrated higher adherence and persistence compared to the TZD users, whereas adherence was comparable between TZD and SU users. In cohort 1, TZD therapy was associated with increased risks of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.23) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. In cohort 2, TZDs were associated with lower risks of myocardial infarction (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99), major adverse CV events (HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95), hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.93) compared with SUs. High adherence to TZDs was consistently associated with more favorable CV and survival outcomes, in comparison to SUs. In this nationwide cohort, TZD therapy, especially with high adherence, reduced CV risk and mortality compared with SUs and DPP-4 inhibitors, highlighting the importance of sustained TZD adherence for optimal long-term outcomes in routine clinical practice.

MedicineVol. 105(11)
Inha University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Yonsei University Health System (KR), Ajou University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.