Efficacy of home-based low-level laser therapy in patients with low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

This study tests the effect of home-based portable low-level laser therapy(spot size of the laser 0.16 cm2, consisting of a total 110 pieces of multi-wavelength vertical-cavity surface-emittinglaser diodes(55 units at 670nm with 1mW output each, 25 units at 780nm with 2mW output each, 10 units at 830nm with 15mW output each, and 20 units at 910nm with 5mW output each) for treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty patients with low back pain were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, home-based self-therapy trial. The experimental group (n = 15) received laser stimulation of the painful area of their backs using the CarerayTM, while the control group (n = 15) received sham stimulation using identical equipment that generated a red light only without laser output. Both groups self-treated for 20 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks (a total of 15 sessions). The primary outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain, ranging from 0 (painless) to 10 (extreme pain). The secondary outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index-Korean test (ODI-K), Schober’s test, and a 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Outcome measurements were taken before and after treatment. All thirty participants provided outcome data. After the intervention, both groups reported significantly reduced VAS scores. In the experimental group, scores decreased from a pre-treatment average of 4.38±1.19 to a post-treatment average of 3.25±1.04, a change of ∆1.13±1.13 (p = 0.026). The control group's scores dropped from a pre-treatment average of 4.00±0.53 to a post-treatment average of 2.88±0.83, a change of ∆1.13±0.83 (p = 0.024) in the within-group comparison. Both group showed a significant improvement in Schober’s test results (experiment group: p = 0.007, control group: p = 0.002). In the ODI-K and SF-36, both group showed improvements, but only the control group showed significant improvements. There were no significant differences between the two groups across all outcomes, and no side effects were reported. Medical laser irradiation is a portable and easy to use laser therapeutic modality without side effects. Further research is needed regarding physical therapeutic modalities that are readily accessible to patients experiencing chronic low back pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lasers in Medical Science
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04793-1
Primary Topic
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of home-based low-level laser therapy in patients with low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Myoung-Hwan Ko, Sung-Hee Park, Gi-Wook Kim, Da-Sol Kim et al.
Lasers in Medical Science
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
article

Efficacy of home-based low-level laser therapy in patients with low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Myoung-Hwan Ko, Sung-Hee Park, Gi-Wook Kim, Da-Sol Kim, Au-Jin Wang, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Yu-Hui Won
article en

Abstract

This study tests the effect of home-based portable low-level laser therapy(spot size of the laser 0.16 cm2, consisting of a total 110 pieces of multi-wavelength vertical-cavity surface-emittinglaser diodes(55 units at 670nm with 1mW output each, 25 units at 780nm with 2mW output each, 10 units at 830nm with 15mW output each, and 20 units at 910nm with 5mW output each) for treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty patients with low back pain were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, home-based self-therapy trial. The experimental group (n = 15) received laser stimulation of the painful area of their backs using the CarerayTM, while the control group (n = 15) received sham stimulation using identical equipment that generated a red light only without laser output. Both groups self-treated for 20 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks (a total of 15 sessions). The primary outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain, ranging from 0 (painless) to 10 (extreme pain). The secondary outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index-Korean test (ODI-K), Schober’s test, and a 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Outcome measurements were taken before and after treatment. All thirty participants provided outcome data. After the intervention, both groups reported significantly reduced VAS scores. In the experimental group, scores decreased from a pre-treatment average of 4.38±1.19 to a post-treatment average of 3.25±1.04, a change of ∆1.13±1.13 (p = 0.026). The control group's scores dropped from a pre-treatment average of 4.00±0.53 to a post-treatment average of 2.88±0.83, a change of ∆1.13±0.83 (p = 0.024) in the within-group comparison. Both group showed a significant improvement in Schober’s test results (experiment group: p = 0.007, control group: p = 0.002). In the ODI-K and SF-36, both group showed improvements, but only the control group showed significant improvements. There were no significant differences between the two groups across all outcomes, and no side effects were reported. Medical laser irradiation is a portable and easy to use laser therapeutic modality without side effects. Further research is needed regarding physical therapeutic modalities that are readily accessible to patients experiencing chronic low back pain.

Lasers in Medical ScienceVol. 41(1)
Jeonbuk National University Hospital (KR), Jeonbuk National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Jeonbuk National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.