Why nonlinear models matter: unified analysis of cognitive load, stress, and exercise using wearable physiological signals

<i>Objective.</i>Physiological measurements obtained from wearable devices reflect complex autonomic nervous system dynamics that are often assumed to follow simple linear relationships, such as elevated heart rate under stress or reduced stress during exercise. This study investigates whether physiological state recognition from wearable measurements is fundamentally linear or nonlinear by examining stress, cognitive load, and physical exercise detection.<i>Approach.</i>A unified signal-processing and evaluation framework was applied to three publicly available Empatica E4 datasets covering structured stress induction, real-world exam stress, aerobic and anaerobic exercise, and cognitive load tasks. Standardized preprocessing, window-based feature extraction, subject-independent evaluation, leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation, multimodal ablation studies, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-based interpretability analysis were conducted. Multiple linear models (logistic regression, linear support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis, and ridge classifier) were compared against nonlinear approaches, including SVM(RBF), random forest, gradient boosting, XGBoost, and LightGBM.<i>Main results.</i>Across all datasets, nonlinear models consistently outperformed linear baselines. Tree-based ensembles achieved 0.89-0.98 accuracy and 0.96-0.99 AUC, whereas linear models remained below 0.70-0.73 AUC. LOSO validation revealed substantial inter-individual variability, yet nonlinear models retained moderate cross-person generalization. Ablation results confirmed the importance of multimodal fusion, particularly electrodermal activity, temperature, and accelerometry. SHAP analysis revealed nonlinear and interaction-driven feature effects consistent with known autonomic mechanisms.<i>Significance.</i>These findings demonstrate that physiological state recognition from wearable measurements is inherently nonlinear, even when individual modalities exhibit monotonic trends. The study establishes a unified benchmark and supports the necessity of nonlinear modeling for robust, real-time wearable health-monitoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Measurement
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae520c
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why nonlinear models matter: unified analysis of cognitive load, stress, and exercise using wearable physiological signals

Khondakar Ashik Shahriar
Physiological Measurement
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Why nonlinear models matter: unified analysis of cognitive load, stress, and exercise using wearable physiological signals

Khondakar Ashik Shahriar
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Physiological measurements obtained from wearable devices reflect complex autonomic nervous system dynamics that are often assumed to follow simple linear relationships, such as elevated heart rate under stress or reduced stress during exercise. This study investigates whether physiological state recognition from wearable measurements is fundamentally linear or nonlinear by examining stress, cognitive load, and physical exercise detection.<i>Approach.</i>A unified signal-processing and evaluation framework was applied to three publicly available Empatica E4 datasets covering structured stress induction, real-world exam stress, aerobic and anaerobic exercise, and cognitive load tasks. Standardized preprocessing, window-based feature extraction, subject-independent evaluation, leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation, multimodal ablation studies, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-based interpretability analysis were conducted. Multiple linear models (logistic regression, linear support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis, and ridge classifier) were compared against nonlinear approaches, including SVM(RBF), random forest, gradient boosting, XGBoost, and LightGBM.<i>Main results.</i>Across all datasets, nonlinear models consistently outperformed linear baselines. Tree-based ensembles achieved 0.89-0.98 accuracy and 0.96-0.99 AUC, whereas linear models remained below 0.70-0.73 AUC. LOSO validation revealed substantial inter-individual variability, yet nonlinear models retained moderate cross-person generalization. Ablation results confirmed the importance of multimodal fusion, particularly electrodermal activity, temperature, and accelerometry. SHAP analysis revealed nonlinear and interaction-driven feature effects consistent with known autonomic mechanisms.<i>Significance.</i>These findings demonstrate that physiological state recognition from wearable measurements is inherently nonlinear, even when individual modalities exhibit monotonic trends. The study establishes a unified benchmark and supports the necessity of nonlinear modeling for robust, real-time wearable health-monitoring systems.

Physiological MeasurementVol. 47(3)
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why nonlinear models matter: unified analysis of cognitive load, stress, and exercise using wearable physiological signals — Khondakar Ashik Shahriar · Physiological Measurement (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS