Nonprewhitening model observers in the Fourier and spatial domain: a comparison of predictions for iterative and deep learning reconstruction in computed tomography

The nonprewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) is frequently used to assess task-based image quality in computed tomography (CT). However, modern reconstruction algorithms, based on iterative reconstruction (IR) or Deep Learning image reconstruction (DLIR), exhibit properties that undermine Fourier domain approaches. One alternative is to abandon the NPWMF. Here, instead, calculation of the NPWMF in the spatial domain is explored with and without assumption of Gaussian observer response. Model observer predictions of area-under-the-curve were determined for a Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare) and a NAEOTOM Alpha scanner (Siemens Healthineers). For the former, the vendor's IR and DLIR were investigated. For the latter, the vendor's IR was used and compared to results from a reader study. Results support the conclusion that Fourier domain calculations can exaggerate benefits of denoising and that spatial domain calculations can provide good agreement with human observers. Assumption of Gaussian observer response did not lead to substantial errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf160
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprewhitening model observers in the Fourier and spatial domain: a comparison of predictions for iterative and deep learning reconstruction in computed tomography

Rebecca Titternes, Daniel E. Thor, Gavin G. Poludniowski, Jessica D. Flores
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Nonprewhitening model observers in the Fourier and spatial domain: a comparison of predictions for iterative and deep learning reconstruction in computed tomography

Rebecca Titternes, Daniel E. Thor, Gavin G. Poludniowski, Jessica D. Flores
article en

Abstract

The nonprewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) is frequently used to assess task-based image quality in computed tomography (CT). However, modern reconstruction algorithms, based on iterative reconstruction (IR) or Deep Learning image reconstruction (DLIR), exhibit properties that undermine Fourier domain approaches. One alternative is to abandon the NPWMF. Here, instead, calculation of the NPWMF in the spatial domain is explored with and without assumption of Gaussian observer response. Model observer predictions of area-under-the-curve were determined for a Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare) and a NAEOTOM Alpha scanner (Siemens Healthineers). For the former, the vendor's IR and DLIR were investigated. For the latter, the vendor's IR was used and compared to results from a reader study. Results support the conclusion that Fourier domain calculations can exaggerate benefits of denoising and that spatial domain calculations can provide good agreement with human observers. Assumption of Gaussian observer response did not lead to substantial errors.

Radiation Protection DosimetryVol. 202(3–4)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nonprewhitening model observers in the Fourier and spatial domain: a comparison of predictions for iterative and deep learning reconstruction in computed tomography — Rebecca Titternes, Daniel E. Thor, et al. · Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS