Collective Paternalism and Vaccination Programs
One important objection to vaccination policies involving nudging or coercive measures such as restrictions on unvaccinated people's access to public spaces is that they are paternalistic. This objection is weaker than is often assumed. We defend this claim by (1) introducing a novel distinction between individual and collective paternalism; (2) showing that, across a range of circumstances, vaccination programs involve collective, not individual, paternalism; and (3) arguing that collective paternalism is not wrong for the reasons that, arguably, individual paternalism is.
Authors
- Didde Boisen Andersen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-3502)
- Søren Flinch Midtgaard
- Viki Lyngby Hvid
- Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Institutions
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
- Published
- 2026-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhag009
- Primary Topic
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00