Is Routine Double-J Stenting Necessary in Pediatric Pyeloplasty?

Background The role of routine internal drainage with a double-J (DJ) ureteral stent in pediatric pyeloplasty remains controversial. While stents are frequently used in minimally invasive approaches, their necessity in open surgery is debated, particularly regarding their impact on postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether the routine use of DJ stents influences postoperative complication rates in pediatric pyeloplasty within a multicenter international collaborative cohort. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled multicenter database including pediatric patients undergoing pyeloplasty (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) across four international institutions. Patients were categorized according to DJ stent use. The primary outcome was the overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection (UTI), reoperation, and length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic and robotic cases, in which DJ stents were routinely used, served as contemporary reference controls. Comparative analyses were performed between stented and non-stented cases, with statistical significance defined as a p-value <0.05. Results A total of 231 pediatric pyeloplasty cases with complete documentation regarding DJ stent utilization (presence or absence) were included in the comparative analysis. Open pyeloplasty cases were performed with or without DJ stenting, while minimally invasive approaches predominantly included routine stenting. Complication rates were 26.7% in the stented group and 20.4% in the non-stented group (p = 0.39). Reoperation rates were 3.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.81). No statistically significant differences were observed in rates of UTI, reoperation, or length of stay. Outcomes remained consistent across surgical approaches and stent utilization strategies. Conclusions Routine use of a DJ stent does not reduce postoperative complications in pediatric pyeloplasty. In this multicenter cohort, comparable outcomes were observed with and without internal drainage. These findings suggest that routine DJ placement is likely unnecessary in most open pyeloplasty cases and support a selective rather than universal stenting strategy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.105170
Primary Topic
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Routine Double-J Stenting Necessary in Pediatric Pyeloplasty?

TIAGO ELIAS ROSITO, Ignacio P. Tobia González, Sebastián G Tobia González, Jose Fadil Iturralde et al.
Cureus
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
article

Is Routine Double-J Stenting Necessary in Pediatric Pyeloplasty?

TIAGO ELIAS ROSITO, Ignacio P. Tobia González, Sebastián G Tobia González, Jose Fadil Iturralde, Anna Bujons Tur
article en

Abstract

Background The role of routine internal drainage with a double-J (DJ) ureteral stent in pediatric pyeloplasty remains controversial. While stents are frequently used in minimally invasive approaches, their necessity in open surgery is debated, particularly regarding their impact on postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether the routine use of DJ stents influences postoperative complication rates in pediatric pyeloplasty within a multicenter international collaborative cohort. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled multicenter database including pediatric patients undergoing pyeloplasty (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) across four international institutions. Patients were categorized according to DJ stent use. The primary outcome was the overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection (UTI), reoperation, and length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic and robotic cases, in which DJ stents were routinely used, served as contemporary reference controls. Comparative analyses were performed between stented and non-stented cases, with statistical significance defined as a p-value <0.05. Results A total of 231 pediatric pyeloplasty cases with complete documentation regarding DJ stent utilization (presence or absence) were included in the comparative analysis. Open pyeloplasty cases were performed with or without DJ stenting, while minimally invasive approaches predominantly included routine stenting. Complication rates were 26.7% in the stented group and 20.4% in the non-stented group (p = 0.39). Reoperation rates were 3.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.81). No statistically significant differences were observed in rates of UTI, reoperation, or length of stay. Outcomes remained consistent across surgical approaches and stent utilization strategies. Conclusions Routine use of a DJ stent does not reduce postoperative complications in pediatric pyeloplasty. In this multicenter cohort, comparable outcomes were observed with and without internal drainage. These findings suggest that routine DJ placement is likely unnecessary in most open pyeloplasty cases and support a selective rather than universal stenting strategy.

Cureus
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.