Using a peer-led network to overcome the barriers to innovation in the NHS: the case of the NHS InSites Programme

Background The adoption and spread of innovation remain persistent challenges for the English National Health Service (NHS). Traditional top-down approaches provide authority but often fail to account for local context, while bottom-up approaches harness frontline knowledge but fail to overcome systemic inertia. The NHS InSites Programme offers a distinctive alternative that seeks to transcend this dichotomy by combining peer-led learning networks with centralised coordination. We aim to explore the factors that support or hinder the adoption and spread of innovation in the context of the NHS InSites Programme. Method This qualitative study draws on 25 semistructured interviews with 33 participants, including NHS staff, InSites Hub members and NHS England commissioners. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key barriers and facilitators to innovation adoption and spread. Findings Participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards the NHS InSites Programme, viewing it as a valuable catalyst for collaboration, learning and structured innovation support, bridging the limitations of top-down and bottom-up approaches to innovation spread. Four overarching themes influencing innovation adoption were identified: ringfenced financial support; transcending hierarchical structures; harmonising processes to navigate fragmentation and challenging context. Our analysis also showed that the programme’s effectiveness relies on relational trust to enhance learning; harmonised processes to allow adaptation and institutional support to transcend hierarchical structures. Conclusion By providing dedicated resources, harmonising processes and enabling peer-to-peer learning, the NHS InSites Programme addresses several well-documented barriers to spreading innovation. Its long-term contribution will depend on sustained investment, continued policy support and the ability to scale its mechanisms beyond early adopter sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2025-001509
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a peer-led network to overcome the barriers to innovation in the NHS: the case of the NHS InSites Programme

Atena Barat, Charitini Stavropoulou, Harry Scarbrough, Fiona McKenzie et al.
BMJ Innovations
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Using a peer-led network to overcome the barriers to innovation in the NHS: the case of the NHS InSites Programme

Atena Barat, Charitini Stavropoulou, Harry Scarbrough, Fiona McKenzie, Jana Schulte, Hemali Patel
article en

Abstract

Background The adoption and spread of innovation remain persistent challenges for the English National Health Service (NHS). Traditional top-down approaches provide authority but often fail to account for local context, while bottom-up approaches harness frontline knowledge but fail to overcome systemic inertia. The NHS InSites Programme offers a distinctive alternative that seeks to transcend this dichotomy by combining peer-led learning networks with centralised coordination. We aim to explore the factors that support or hinder the adoption and spread of innovation in the context of the NHS InSites Programme. Method This qualitative study draws on 25 semistructured interviews with 33 participants, including NHS staff, InSites Hub members and NHS England commissioners. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key barriers and facilitators to innovation adoption and spread. Findings Participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards the NHS InSites Programme, viewing it as a valuable catalyst for collaboration, learning and structured innovation support, bridging the limitations of top-down and bottom-up approaches to innovation spread. Four overarching themes influencing innovation adoption were identified: ringfenced financial support; transcending hierarchical structures; harmonising processes to navigate fragmentation and challenging context. Our analysis also showed that the programme’s effectiveness relies on relational trust to enhance learning; harmonised processes to allow adaptation and institutional support to transcend hierarchical structures. Conclusion By providing dedicated resources, harmonising processes and enabling peer-to-peer learning, the NHS InSites Programme addresses several well-documented barriers to spreading innovation. Its long-term contribution will depend on sustained investment, continued policy support and the ability to scale its mechanisms beyond early adopter sites.

BMJ Innovations
St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), Basildon Hospital (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.