Thinking With, Not Just About, Nature: Reimagining the Business–Nature Relationship

Business scholarship has long engaged with the natural environment, yet it rarely pauses to examine what is meant by nature itself. Most research reflects an atomistic orientation that fragments nature into measurable categories, such as carbon, water, and biodiversity, rendering it legible but stripped of interdependence, relationality, and deeper meaning. In response, in this perspective we advance an emerging holistic orientation to business–nature relations that reconceives organizations as ecologically embedded participants rather than external managers of nature. We contrast these orientations based on five dimensions: underlying logic , ethical framing , scope of responsibility , core proxies , and managerial responses . We then offer several promising avenues for future research to advance a holistic orientation grouped around three domains: worldviews, governance, and operations. Ultimately, we urge management scholars to think with, not merely about, nature, treating ecological complexity as a source of theoretical renewal, ethical reflection, and collective flourishing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business & Society
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503261425556
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking With, Not Just About, Nature: Reimagining the Business–Nature Relationship

Simon Pek, Céline Louche, Rajat Panwar, Frederik Dahlmann
Business & Society
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Thinking With, Not Just About, Nature: Reimagining the Business–Nature Relationship

Simon Pek, Céline Louche, Rajat Panwar, Frederik Dahlmann
article en

Abstract

Business scholarship has long engaged with the natural environment, yet it rarely pauses to examine what is meant by nature itself. Most research reflects an atomistic orientation that fragments nature into measurable categories, such as carbon, water, and biodiversity, rendering it legible but stripped of interdependence, relationality, and deeper meaning. In response, in this perspective we advance an emerging holistic orientation to business–nature relations that reconceives organizations as ecologically embedded participants rather than external managers of nature. We contrast these orientations based on five dimensions: underlying logic , ethical framing , scope of responsibility , core proxies , and managerial responses . We then offer several promising avenues for future research to advance a holistic orientation grouped around three domains: worldviews, governance, and operations. Ultimately, we urge management scholars to think with, not merely about, nature, treating ecological complexity as a source of theoretical renewal, ethical reflection, and collective flourishing.

Business & Society
Oregon State University (US), University of Victoria (CA), University of Warwick (GB), University of Waikato (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.