Exploring climate and biodiversity projects in African biosphere reserves in contributing to sustainability dynamics

Abstract Climate-related projects within UNESCO’s AfriMAB biosphere reserves are increasingly positioned to advance climate mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development across African landscapes. Yet there is limited systematic and comparative evidence on how these initiatives align simultaneously with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) framework, and AfriMAB remains underrepresented relative to EuroMAB in empirical mapping studies. Addressing this gap, this study analyses 81 climate-related projects across 28 biosphere reserves in 19 countries using expert survey data, documentary triangulation, and goal-level SDG and CBD classification. The Nexus Approach serves as an analytical lens to assess cross-sector integration between climate, biodiversity, and development objectives. Political Ecology informs analysis of power asymmetries and equity implications, while Adaptive Governance and Sustainability Transitions perspectives interpret institutional capacity and long-term durability. Findings reveal a strong concentration on environmental goals, particularly climate action and ecosystem restoration, while socio-economic and institutional dimensions remain comparatively underrepresented. Limited emphasis on governance-related SDGs, especially SDGs 16 and 17, raises concerns about institutional resilience, accountability, and equitable benefit-sharing. This imbalance reflects structural constraints including donor funding priorities, fragmented governance arrangements, and uneven institutional capacity. Comparative reference to EuroMAB suggests that more balanced SDG integration emerges where governance structures and financing mechanisms are more stable. By systematically mapping climate projects across AfriMAB biosphere reserves, this study provides one of the first empirical assessments of how global climate, biodiversity, and development frameworks intersect in African biosphere reserve practice, contributing to sustainability and governance scholarship on nexus-based implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Environment
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00637-z
Primary Topic
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring climate and biodiversity projects in African biosphere reserves in contributing to sustainability dynamics

Susanne Becken, Nina Green, Hubert Job
Discover Environment
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
article

Exploring climate and biodiversity projects in African biosphere reserves in contributing to sustainability dynamics

Susanne Becken, Nina Green, Hubert Job
article en

Abstract

Abstract Climate-related projects within UNESCO’s AfriMAB biosphere reserves are increasingly positioned to advance climate mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development across African landscapes. Yet there is limited systematic and comparative evidence on how these initiatives align simultaneously with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) framework, and AfriMAB remains underrepresented relative to EuroMAB in empirical mapping studies. Addressing this gap, this study analyses 81 climate-related projects across 28 biosphere reserves in 19 countries using expert survey data, documentary triangulation, and goal-level SDG and CBD classification. The Nexus Approach serves as an analytical lens to assess cross-sector integration between climate, biodiversity, and development objectives. Political Ecology informs analysis of power asymmetries and equity implications, while Adaptive Governance and Sustainability Transitions perspectives interpret institutional capacity and long-term durability. Findings reveal a strong concentration on environmental goals, particularly climate action and ecosystem restoration, while socio-economic and institutional dimensions remain comparatively underrepresented. Limited emphasis on governance-related SDGs, especially SDGs 16 and 17, raises concerns about institutional resilience, accountability, and equitable benefit-sharing. This imbalance reflects structural constraints including donor funding priorities, fragmented governance arrangements, and uneven institutional capacity. Comparative reference to EuroMAB suggests that more balanced SDG integration emerges where governance structures and financing mechanisms are more stable. By systematically mapping climate projects across AfriMAB biosphere reserves, this study provides one of the first empirical assessments of how global climate, biodiversity, and development frameworks intersect in African biosphere reserve practice, contributing to sustainability and governance scholarship on nexus-based implementation.

Discover EnvironmentVol. 4(1)
Griffith University (AU), University of Würzburg (DE), ARL – Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (DE)
Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.