Rural Capitalists and Development in Colonial Africa: A Comparative Analysis

ABSTRACT This paper explores the emergence and role of rural capitalists in colonial Sub‐Saharan Africa by comparing three peasant‐based economies: Bechuanaland, the Gold Coast and Tanganyika. Using social tables, we estimate the population and income shares of better earning agricultural producers and assess their impact on rural inequality and development. We find that rural capitalists in each colony adapted their economic strategies to local ecological, economic and institutional contexts, leading to varied outcomes in terms of economic development and income differentiation. In Bechuanaland, capital‐intensive cattle production fuelled exclusionary growth and deepening polarization. In the Gold Coast, early inclusive gains from cocoa cultivation gave way to rising inequality. In Tanganyika, smallholder expansion in coffee production yielded more broadly shared benefits. By shifting attention from aggregate commercialization to the distributional dynamics among farmers, the paper shows how different forms of accumulation shape rural development outcomes and the limits of market‐led transformation in Sub‐Saharan Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agrarian Change
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70076
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural Capitalists and Development in Colonial Africa: A Comparative Analysis

Prince Young Aboagye, Ellen Hillbom, Sascha Klocke
Journal of Agrarian Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Rural Capitalists and Development in Colonial Africa: A Comparative Analysis

Prince Young Aboagye, Ellen Hillbom, Sascha Klocke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the emergence and role of rural capitalists in colonial Sub‐Saharan Africa by comparing three peasant‐based economies: Bechuanaland, the Gold Coast and Tanganyika. Using social tables, we estimate the population and income shares of better earning agricultural producers and assess their impact on rural inequality and development. We find that rural capitalists in each colony adapted their economic strategies to local ecological, economic and institutional contexts, leading to varied outcomes in terms of economic development and income differentiation. In Bechuanaland, capital‐intensive cattle production fuelled exclusionary growth and deepening polarization. In the Gold Coast, early inclusive gains from cocoa cultivation gave way to rising inequality. In Tanganyika, smallholder expansion in coffee production yielded more broadly shared benefits. By shifting attention from aggregate commercialization to the distributional dynamics among farmers, the paper shows how different forms of accumulation shape rural development outcomes and the limits of market‐led transformation in Sub‐Saharan Africa.

Journal of Agrarian Change
Lund University (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.