Intercropped rye strips constrain the within-field foraging behavior of wild and managed bees on watermelon flowers

Abstract Pollinator-dependent crops are typically uniform habitats but the presence of an interplanted cover crop can increase field heterogeneity, potentially affecting pollinator foraging patterns. Particularly, tall grass species like rye can act as physical barriers, constraining movement between crop rows and reducing flower visitation. In this study, we investigated the effects of rye cover crop on pollinator foraging behavior in seedless watermelon. We used 27 commercial fields between 2022 and 2025, which had either no rye (0% rye), one rye strip to every three watermelon rows (25% rye) or one rye strip every other watermelon row (50% rye). Across years, we conducted 20 observational surveys per rye level during watermelon bloom, recording multiple aspects of foraging behavior. We categorized bees in four guilds: honey bees, bumble bees, large solitary bees and small solitary bees. Overall, the number of flower visits per watermelon row was greatest with higher rye level (0% rye: 1.8, 25% rye: 2.0, 50% rye: 3.3). Rye level affected the number of row changes differently for each pollinator guild. Honey bees and small solitary bees were more affected by rye compared to bumble bees and large solitary bees; they visited more flowers per row but moved between rows less frequently. Large solitary bees exhibited the highest probability of crossing over rye. Our study shows that rye created a barrier effect by funneling bee movement, which may lead to uneven yields. To minimize potential nonuniform pollination, we recommend practices that enhance pollinator distribution and biodiversity for more resilient pollination services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-026-10232-x
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercropped rye strips constrain the within-field foraging behavior of wild and managed bees on watermelon flowers

Ian Kaplan, Zeus Mateos-Fierro, Ashley Leach
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Plant and animal studies
article

Intercropped rye strips constrain the within-field foraging behavior of wild and managed bees on watermelon flowers

Ian Kaplan, Zeus Mateos-Fierro, Ashley Leach
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pollinator-dependent crops are typically uniform habitats but the presence of an interplanted cover crop can increase field heterogeneity, potentially affecting pollinator foraging patterns. Particularly, tall grass species like rye can act as physical barriers, constraining movement between crop rows and reducing flower visitation. In this study, we investigated the effects of rye cover crop on pollinator foraging behavior in seedless watermelon. We used 27 commercial fields between 2022 and 2025, which had either no rye (0% rye), one rye strip to every three watermelon rows (25% rye) or one rye strip every other watermelon row (50% rye). Across years, we conducted 20 observational surveys per rye level during watermelon bloom, recording multiple aspects of foraging behavior. We categorized bees in four guilds: honey bees, bumble bees, large solitary bees and small solitary bees. Overall, the number of flower visits per watermelon row was greatest with higher rye level (0% rye: 1.8, 25% rye: 2.0, 50% rye: 3.3). Rye level affected the number of row changes differently for each pollinator guild. Honey bees and small solitary bees were more affected by rye compared to bumble bees and large solitary bees; they visited more flowers per row but moved between rows less frequently. Large solitary bees exhibited the highest probability of crossing over rye. Our study shows that rye created a barrier effect by funneling bee movement, which may lead to uneven yields. To minimize potential nonuniform pollination, we recommend practices that enhance pollinator distribution and biodiversity for more resilient pollination services.

Arthropod-Plant InteractionsVol. 20(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.