Difference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The achievement of stable and functional occlusal contacts represents a key objective of orthodontic treatment, particularly in growing patients. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities in establishing adequate occlusal contacts in growing patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare occlusal contact characteristics following clear aligner therapy (CAT) and fixed orthodontic therapy (FAT). <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-four growing patients (<18 years with permanent dentition) were included in the study and divided into two groups: 12 patients treated with fixed appliances and 12 treated with clear aligners. Post-treatment digital dental scans were analyzed to assess occlusal contacts. Contacts were calculated as the minimum distance between upper and lower arches using a color-map analysis. The following outcomes were evaluated: Maximum Contact Point (MCP), occlusal contact surface (OCS, ≤50 μm from MCP), near occlusal contact surface (NOCS, ≤350 μm), half mm (≤0.5 mm), and one mm (≤1 mm). Total occlusal contacts, antero-posterior distribution, left-right asymmetry, and single-tooth contacts were assessed. <b>Results</b>: The FAT group showed higher total occlusal contact values in OCS compared to the CAT group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Statistical difference was also observed in the antero-posterior ratio, with FAT presenting fewer anterior contacts in OCS, NOCS, half-mm, and one-mm measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of left-right asymmetry or post-treatment single-tooth contacts, except for the second premolar, which exhibited higher contacts in the FAT group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Fixed orthodontic treatment is more effective than aligners in achieving adequate occlusal contacts, with differences limited to tight contacts and antero-posterior occlusal distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030169
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study

Roberto Rongo, Vincenzo D’Antò, Ambra Michelotti, Gerarda Buonocore et al.
Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Difference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study

Roberto Rongo, Vincenzo D’Antò, Ambra Michelotti, Gerarda Buonocore, Giorgio Oliva, Roberta Maddaluno, Rosa Valletta
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The achievement of stable and functional occlusal contacts represents a key objective of orthodontic treatment, particularly in growing patients. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities in establishing adequate occlusal contacts in growing patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare occlusal contact characteristics following clear aligner therapy (CAT) and fixed orthodontic therapy (FAT). <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-four growing patients (<18 years with permanent dentition) were included in the study and divided into two groups: 12 patients treated with fixed appliances and 12 treated with clear aligners. Post-treatment digital dental scans were analyzed to assess occlusal contacts. Contacts were calculated as the minimum distance between upper and lower arches using a color-map analysis. The following outcomes were evaluated: Maximum Contact Point (MCP), occlusal contact surface (OCS, ≤50 μm from MCP), near occlusal contact surface (NOCS, ≤350 μm), half mm (≤0.5 mm), and one mm (≤1 mm). Total occlusal contacts, antero-posterior distribution, left-right asymmetry, and single-tooth contacts were assessed. <b>Results</b>: The FAT group showed higher total occlusal contact values in OCS compared to the CAT group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Statistical difference was also observed in the antero-posterior ratio, with FAT presenting fewer anterior contacts in OCS, NOCS, half-mm, and one-mm measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of left-right asymmetry or post-treatment single-tooth contacts, except for the second premolar, which exhibited higher contacts in the FAT group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Fixed orthodontic treatment is more effective than aligners in achieving adequate occlusal contacts, with differences limited to tight contacts and antero-posterior occlusal distribution.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(3)
Federico II University Hospital (IT), Iter (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.