Operating in recurrent crises: a qualitative study of decision-making and unintended consequences in a peripheral hospital

Background During crises, decision-makers often operate under uncertainty, relying on limited evidence and intuition, increasing the risk of unintended consequences. In Israel, hospitals have recently faced back-to-back crises: the COVID pandemic and the war following October 7th 2023. Objective This study aimed to explore hospitals’ decision-making processes during crises and how managing one crisis influenced responses to subsequent crises. Methods We conducted a qualitative study guided by a modified version of the World Health Organization’s six building blocks framework, and interviewed 18 key decision-makers in a peripheral hospital. Deductive framework-informed thematic analysis compared decision-making during routine operations versus crises. Results We found that decision-making processes narrowed primarily to managing COVID-19, with heightened oversight of COVID wards and increased interactions with external factors such as the Ministry of Health. Although mechanisms to minimize unintended consequences existed during routine times, non-COVID areas were often deprioritized during the crisis, increasing the risk of unintended consequences. Notably, the pandemic served as a catalyst for organizational learning, strengthening staff preparedness and improving operational and logistical capabilities during the subsequent war. Furthermore, interactions established during the pandemic contributed to streamlined wartime decision-making. Conclusion Decision makers should capitalize internal and external collaborations developed during crises to sustain them during routine times for better preparedness. Moreover, they should mitigate the risk of unintended consequences in non-crisis-related services, which are particularly vulnerable during emergencies. It could be achieved by regular and systematic real-time evaluation checkpoints in place. Future multi-center studies are needed to assess the transferability of these findings across diverse settings and crisis contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1728146
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operating in recurrent crises: a qualitative study of decision-making and unintended consequences in a peripheral hospital

Tomer Bernstine, Sivan Spitzer, Michael Edelstein
Frontiers in Public Health
Disaster Response and Management
article

Operating in recurrent crises: a qualitative study of decision-making and unintended consequences in a peripheral hospital

Tomer Bernstine, Sivan Spitzer, Michael Edelstein
article en

Abstract

Background During crises, decision-makers often operate under uncertainty, relying on limited evidence and intuition, increasing the risk of unintended consequences. In Israel, hospitals have recently faced back-to-back crises: the COVID pandemic and the war following October 7th 2023. Objective This study aimed to explore hospitals’ decision-making processes during crises and how managing one crisis influenced responses to subsequent crises. Methods We conducted a qualitative study guided by a modified version of the World Health Organization’s six building blocks framework, and interviewed 18 key decision-makers in a peripheral hospital. Deductive framework-informed thematic analysis compared decision-making during routine operations versus crises. Results We found that decision-making processes narrowed primarily to managing COVID-19, with heightened oversight of COVID wards and increased interactions with external factors such as the Ministry of Health. Although mechanisms to minimize unintended consequences existed during routine times, non-COVID areas were often deprioritized during the crisis, increasing the risk of unintended consequences. Notably, the pandemic served as a catalyst for organizational learning, strengthening staff preparedness and improving operational and logistical capabilities during the subsequent war. Furthermore, interactions established during the pandemic contributed to streamlined wartime decision-making. Conclusion Decision makers should capitalize internal and external collaborations developed during crises to sustain them during routine times for better preparedness. Moreover, they should mitigate the risk of unintended consequences in non-crisis-related services, which are particularly vulnerable during emergencies. It could be achieved by regular and systematic real-time evaluation checkpoints in place. Future multi-center studies are needed to assess the transferability of these findings across diverse settings and crisis contexts.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Bar-Ilan University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.