Cultural Roots and Linguistic Realizations

This article presents a contrastive analysis of Hindi and Arabic. Although these two languages are genetically and structurally different, they do share common universal cultural concerns regarding social hierarchy and harmony. This has mainly moved beyond the universalist perspective and has taken up a culturally nuanced framework to argue that while both languages facilitate similar socio-pragmatic goals of deference and respect, they achieve these through different mechanisms. Through the analysis, it has been found that whereas Hindi grammaticalizes politeness under its obligatory internalization within its pronominal system (T-V distinction) and verbal morphology, making deference a syntactic obligation, Arabic politeness is realized mainly via lexically indirect and phrasal strategies using a distinctive rich inventory of honorific nouns and highly religious-feeling formulaic utterances. By such comparison, in terms of address terms, honorifics, or formulaic expressions and grammatical structures, this study reveals that under these diverse linguistic realizations—cultural and religious underpinnings, namely those of “adab” in Arabic, “dharma/aadar” in Hindi, shape. The findings highlight the value of pragmatic competence across cultures through communication, translation, and teaching language since pragmatic failures in one culture do not result from a lack of polite vocabulary, but from not having these culturally specific systems internally aligned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/cgp/a223
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Roots and Linguistic Realizations

Sahal R. Alshammari, Amrendra Singh
The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Cultural Roots and Linguistic Realizations

Sahal R. Alshammari, Amrendra Singh
article en

Abstract

This article presents a contrastive analysis of Hindi and Arabic. Although these two languages are genetically and structurally different, they do share common universal cultural concerns regarding social hierarchy and harmony. This has mainly moved beyond the universalist perspective and has taken up a culturally nuanced framework to argue that while both languages facilitate similar socio-pragmatic goals of deference and respect, they achieve these through different mechanisms. Through the analysis, it has been found that whereas Hindi grammaticalizes politeness under its obligatory internalization within its pronominal system (T-V distinction) and verbal morphology, making deference a syntactic obligation, Arabic politeness is realized mainly via lexically indirect and phrasal strategies using a distinctive rich inventory of honorific nouns and highly religious-feeling formulaic utterances. By such comparison, in terms of address terms, honorifics, or formulaic expressions and grammatical structures, this study reveals that under these diverse linguistic realizations—cultural and religious underpinnings, namely those of “adab” in Arabic, “dharma/aadar” in Hindi, shape. The findings highlight the value of pragmatic competence across cultures through communication, translation, and teaching language since pragmatic failures in one culture do not result from a lack of polite vocabulary, but from not having these culturally specific systems internally aligned.

The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies
Northern Border University (SA), Central University of Jammu (IN), Centro Universitario José Vasconcelos (MX)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.