Exploring the Potential of Scales to Assess Different Types of Ataxia: Meta-review

Ataxia is a coordination disorder that encompasses more than 300 neurological diseases and more than 200 types of hereditary ataxia. Depending on the pathology with which it is associated, the symptomatology present is different: balance and gait disturbance, dysdiadochokinesia, dysarthria, nystagmus, etc. Due to this heterogeneity, the assessment of ataxia is a complex task that is further hindered by the broad variety of existing tools, both specific to ataxia and related to a particular pathology, such as those that assess coordination and gait components. Analyse, organize and compare the structural and psychometric characteristics of the tools used for the assessment of different types of ataxia. A meta-review registered in PROSPERO was conducted following the PRISMA Checklist System. Six database were used and two blinded researchers selected the papers according the criteria. Five reviews were included in this study. The main psychometric properties of the 16 scales found to assess ataxia symptoms in different pathologies were analysed. Internal consistency and reliability obtained good-to-excellent values for the total score of the different scales and parameters studied. However, validity and sensitivity showed less homogeneous values. The scales that globally assess the severity of the disease stand out, with a great variety of scales, including the International Cooperative Ataxia Assessment Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxias (SARA) as the most widely used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cerebellum
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-026-01969-5
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Potential of Scales to Assess Different Types of Ataxia: Meta-review

Rita-Pilar Romero-Galisteo, Manuel González-Sánchez, Sonia Racero-Ríos
The Cerebellum
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

Exploring the Potential of Scales to Assess Different Types of Ataxia: Meta-review

Rita-Pilar Romero-Galisteo, Manuel González-Sánchez, Sonia Racero-Ríos
article en

Abstract

Ataxia is a coordination disorder that encompasses more than 300 neurological diseases and more than 200 types of hereditary ataxia. Depending on the pathology with which it is associated, the symptomatology present is different: balance and gait disturbance, dysdiadochokinesia, dysarthria, nystagmus, etc. Due to this heterogeneity, the assessment of ataxia is a complex task that is further hindered by the broad variety of existing tools, both specific to ataxia and related to a particular pathology, such as those that assess coordination and gait components. Analyse, organize and compare the structural and psychometric characteristics of the tools used for the assessment of different types of ataxia. A meta-review registered in PROSPERO was conducted following the PRISMA Checklist System. Six database were used and two blinded researchers selected the papers according the criteria. Five reviews were included in this study. The main psychometric properties of the 16 scales found to assess ataxia symptoms in different pathologies were analysed. Internal consistency and reliability obtained good-to-excellent values for the total score of the different scales and parameters studied. However, validity and sensitivity showed less homogeneous values. The scales that globally assess the severity of the disease stand out, with a great variety of scales, including the International Cooperative Ataxia Assessment Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxias (SARA) as the most widely used.

The CerebellumVol. 25(2)
Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.