Celocentesis: Current Evidence and Future Directions

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to review current evidence on celocentesis as an early invasive prenatal diagnostic technique, focusing on its clinical applications, diagnostic accuracy, safety profile, and future perspectives in modern fetal medicine. <b>Methods:</b> A narrative review of the literature was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases up to October 2025. Studies reporting original data on celocentesis-including prospective studies, case reports, and case series-were included. Relevant outcomes were feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy. <b>Results:</b> Since its first description in 1993, celocentesis has been successfully performed between 6 and 9 weeks' gestation in several small case series. Improvements in ultrasound resolution and molecular analysis techniques have significantly enhanced its reliability. In specialized centers using dedicated fetal cell selection and contamination-control workflows, analytical diagnostic success for selected monogenic conditions exceeds 99%. Reported miscarriage rates are comparable to what is expected at a very early gestational age (10% of all clinically recognized pregnancies). The procedure remains mainly experimental, with no standardized protocols or large multicentric validation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Celocentesis is the earliest available technique for prenatal genetic diagnosis. While promising, its clinical implementation requires further standardization, comprehensive operator training, and robust evidence from prospective studies regarding its safety and diagnostic reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062196
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Celocentesis: Current Evidence and Future Directions

S. Visentin, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Francesco Picciotto, Alessandra Andrisani et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Celocentesis: Current Evidence and Future Directions

S. Visentin, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Francesco Picciotto, Alessandra Andrisani, Erich Cosmi, Antonino Giambona, Margherita Vinciguerra, Matteo Cassina, Kypros H. Nicolaides, Fabiana Cecchini
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to review current evidence on celocentesis as an early invasive prenatal diagnostic technique, focusing on its clinical applications, diagnostic accuracy, safety profile, and future perspectives in modern fetal medicine. <b>Methods:</b> A narrative review of the literature was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases up to October 2025. Studies reporting original data on celocentesis-including prospective studies, case reports, and case series-were included. Relevant outcomes were feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy. <b>Results:</b> Since its first description in 1993, celocentesis has been successfully performed between 6 and 9 weeks' gestation in several small case series. Improvements in ultrasound resolution and molecular analysis techniques have significantly enhanced its reliability. In specialized centers using dedicated fetal cell selection and contamination-control workflows, analytical diagnostic success for selected monogenic conditions exceeds 99%. Reported miscarriage rates are comparable to what is expected at a very early gestational age (10% of all clinically recognized pregnancies). The procedure remains mainly experimental, with no standardized protocols or large multicentric validation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Celocentesis is the earliest available technique for prenatal genetic diagnosis. While promising, its clinical implementation requires further standardization, comprehensive operator training, and robust evidence from prospective studies regarding its safety and diagnostic reliability.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), Ospedale Vincenzo Cervello (IT), Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), King's College Hospital (GB), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.