Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the traditional surgical standard, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative. Evidence comparing both techniques in small prostates (<50 mL) remains limited. Methods: This retrospective study included male patients aged 40-80 years who underwent bipolar TURP (B-TURP) or HoLEP between 2023 and 2025 for LUTS refractory to medical therapy, with prostate volume <50 mL. Pre- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, irrigation volume, hospital stay, catheterization time, and functional scores (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR)) were compared. Results: No significant differences were found between groups regarding age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, ICIQ-SF scores, IIEF-5, complication rates, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease (all P > .05). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate showed longer operative time, greater irrigation use, and higher resected tissue weight/percentage (P = .03, .02, <.001, <.001), while hospital stay and catheterization were shorter (both P < .001). Both procedures improved Qmax and IPSS and reduced PVR (all P < .001); the increase in Qmax was greater in HoLEP (P = .025). Conclusion: Both B-TURP and HoLEP are safe and effective for small prostates; however, HoLEP offers advantages in resected tissue weight, Qmax improvement, and shorter hospital stay/catheterization. Cite this article as: G.lbaşı A, Elmaağa. B, Bi.er H, .zercan AY, Günal S, Keske M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs. bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for small-volume prostates: A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2025;51(6):225-229.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urology Research and Practice
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.25132
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Abdullah Gölbaşı, Burak Elmaağaç, Murat Keske, Hüseyin Biçer et al.
Urology Research and Practice
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Abdullah Gölbaşı, Burak Elmaağaç, Murat Keske, Hüseyin Biçer, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Sefa Günal
article en

Abstract

Objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the traditional surgical standard, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative. Evidence comparing both techniques in small prostates (<50 mL) remains limited. Methods: This retrospective study included male patients aged 40-80 years who underwent bipolar TURP (B-TURP) or HoLEP between 2023 and 2025 for LUTS refractory to medical therapy, with prostate volume <50 mL. Pre- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, irrigation volume, hospital stay, catheterization time, and functional scores (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR)) were compared. Results: No significant differences were found between groups regarding age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, ICIQ-SF scores, IIEF-5, complication rates, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease (all P > .05). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate showed longer operative time, greater irrigation use, and higher resected tissue weight/percentage (P = .03, .02, <.001, <.001), while hospital stay and catheterization were shorter (both P < .001). Both procedures improved Qmax and IPSS and reduced PVR (all P < .001); the increase in Qmax was greater in HoLEP (P = .025). Conclusion: Both B-TURP and HoLEP are safe and effective for small prostates; however, HoLEP offers advantages in resected tissue weight, Qmax improvement, and shorter hospital stay/catheterization. Cite this article as: G.lbaşı A, Elmaağa. B, Bi.er H, .zercan AY, Günal S, Keske M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs. bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for small-volume prostates: A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2025;51(6):225-229.

Urology Research and PracticeVol. 51(6)
Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.