Tom Cruise was in Norway – and so what? An overview of the Norwegian film and series incentive scheme

This article provides the first examination of Norway’s film and television incentive scheme, introduced in 2016 as the first in Scandinavia. The scheme, offering a 25 per cent cash rebate on qualifying production costs, was designed to attract international productions, reduce domestic runaway production and promote regional development. Drawing on policy documents, evaluations and industry perspectives, the article explores the scheme’s implementation, objectives and ongoing debates. While the incentive has created work opportunities and boosted film tourism by attracting high-profile productions like Mission: Impossible , Norway has lost big productions due to limited budgets and restrictive conditions. Paradoxically, Norway is experiencing a ‘golden age’ of screen production, yet domestic film workers leave the industry due to limited work opportunities. Despite criticism, the government has remained passive. A high turnover of culture ministers since the implementation in 2016 has contributed to the scheme’s unsettled state and lack of strategic continuity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scandinavian Cinema
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/jsca_00140_1
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tom Cruise was in Norway – and so what? An overview of the Norwegian film and series incentive scheme

Stine Agnete Sand
Journal of Scandinavian Cinema
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Tom Cruise was in Norway – and so what? An overview of the Norwegian film and series incentive scheme

Stine Agnete Sand
article en

Abstract

This article provides the first examination of Norway’s film and television incentive scheme, introduced in 2016 as the first in Scandinavia. The scheme, offering a 25 per cent cash rebate on qualifying production costs, was designed to attract international productions, reduce domestic runaway production and promote regional development. Drawing on policy documents, evaluations and industry perspectives, the article explores the scheme’s implementation, objectives and ongoing debates. While the incentive has created work opportunities and boosted film tourism by attracting high-profile productions like Mission: Impossible , Norway has lost big productions due to limited budgets and restrictive conditions. Paradoxically, Norway is experiencing a ‘golden age’ of screen production, yet domestic film workers leave the industry due to limited work opportunities. Despite criticism, the government has remained passive. A high turnover of culture ministers since the implementation in 2016 has contributed to the scheme’s unsettled state and lack of strategic continuity.

Journal of Scandinavian CinemaVol. 15(3)
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tom Cruise was in Norway – and so what? An overview of the Norwegian film and series incentive scheme — Stine Agnete Sand · Journal of Scandinavian Cinema (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS