Pushing the boundaries - perioperative risk assessment and short-term surgical outcomes in octogenarian patients with head and neck cancer: comparison with non-oncological elderlies

Introduction There is an expanding body of research focuses on the clinical management of patients aged eighty and above. It remains uncertain whether therapeutic approaches for head and neck cancer in this demographic require a higher acceptance of perioperative risk compared to age-matched non-oncological individuals. This study aimed to characterize perioperative risk and early postoperative outcomes in octogenarian patients with and without head and neck cancer, and to explore how different geriatric and surgical risk scales perform in predicting adverse events in these two subgroups. Methods This retrospective analysis encompassed data from eight university-affiliated otorhinolaryngology departments in Poland, covering the period from September 2023 to August 2024. Results The oncological cohort exhibited a markedly higher prevalence of risk factors: male sex, smoking history, and previous malignancies compared with non-oncological cohort. Patients with head and neck cancer also demonstrated substantially elevated results on the Caprini, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, and Venous Thromboembolism scales, indicating increased multimorbidity and surgical risk. Although hospitalization durations were numerically longer for oncological cases, this difference was not statistically significant, and both groups showed similar functional independence and frailty scores. Logistic regression analyses highlighted that complication risk in non-oncological group was best predicted by Caprini scores, whereas the comorbidity index was the most informative predictor in oncological group. Cross-applied models failed to reach significance, confirming distinct risk patterns. Overall, sixteen percent of patients experienced at least one major complication, with oncological status independently associated with increased risk. Discussion These findings demonstrate the multifactorial landscape of perioperative risk among the oldest surgical patients and provide quantitative evidence to support population-specific preoperative strategies in geriatric oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1748506
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pushing the boundaries - perioperative risk assessment and short-term surgical outcomes in octogenarian patients with head and neck cancer: comparison with non-oncological elderlies

Kazimierz Niemczyk, Maria Makuszewska, Maciej Kawczyński, Bogusław Mikaszewski et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Pushing the boundaries - perioperative risk assessment and short-term surgical outcomes in octogenarian patients with head and neck cancer: comparison with non-oncological elderlies

Kazimierz Niemczyk, Maria Makuszewska, Maciej Kawczyński, Bogusław Mikaszewski, Katarzyna Czerwaty, Karolina Dżaman, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Dominik Stodulski, Katarzyna Ciuba, Paweł Burduk, Małgorzata Wierzchowska, Magdalena Rękawek, Dorota Świątek, Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Jarosław Markowski, Kamila Sroka
article en

Abstract

Introduction There is an expanding body of research focuses on the clinical management of patients aged eighty and above. It remains uncertain whether therapeutic approaches for head and neck cancer in this demographic require a higher acceptance of perioperative risk compared to age-matched non-oncological individuals. This study aimed to characterize perioperative risk and early postoperative outcomes in octogenarian patients with and without head and neck cancer, and to explore how different geriatric and surgical risk scales perform in predicting adverse events in these two subgroups. Methods This retrospective analysis encompassed data from eight university-affiliated otorhinolaryngology departments in Poland, covering the period from September 2023 to August 2024. Results The oncological cohort exhibited a markedly higher prevalence of risk factors: male sex, smoking history, and previous malignancies compared with non-oncological cohort. Patients with head and neck cancer also demonstrated substantially elevated results on the Caprini, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, and Venous Thromboembolism scales, indicating increased multimorbidity and surgical risk. Although hospitalization durations were numerically longer for oncological cases, this difference was not statistically significant, and both groups showed similar functional independence and frailty scores. Logistic regression analyses highlighted that complication risk in non-oncological group was best predicted by Caprini scores, whereas the comorbidity index was the most informative predictor in oncological group. Cross-applied models failed to reach significance, confirming distinct risk patterns. Overall, sixteen percent of patients experienced at least one major complication, with oncological status independently associated with increased risk. Discussion These findings demonstrate the multifactorial landscape of perioperative risk among the oldest surgical patients and provide quantitative evidence to support population-specific preoperative strategies in geriatric oncology.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
University of Science and Technology (YE), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), University Medical Center (US), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), University of Bydgoszcz (PL), Regional Development Agency (CZ), Gdańsk Medical University (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.