Opportunistic and Organized Cervical Cancer Screening: Impact on Lesion Severity and Surgical Outcomes in 9830 Cervical Conizations
<b>Objectives</b>: To assess the impact of organized (OgS) versus opportunistic screening (OpS) on grade, extent, and surgical management of cervical lesions, and to evaluate human papillomavirus (HPV)-based versus cytology-based screening within OgS. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzed 9830 women undergoing conization (1992-2021). Data included screening modality, histology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) linear extension, and cone volume. Statistical analysis employed chi-square test, Student's <i>t</i>-tests, Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and Firth's penalized multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of invasive disease. <b>Results</b>: Of 9830 patients, 5097 (52%) were referred from OgS and 4733 (48%) from OpS. OgS patients were significantly older (40.0 vs. 37.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the final decade, OgS achieved a significantly lower rate of invasive carcinomas compared to OpS (1.1% vs. 2.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean CIN3 extension and cone volume were significantly lower in OgS (6.5 mm; 1150 mm<sup>3</sup>) than in OpS (7.1 mm; 1580 mm<sup>3</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within OgS, HPV-detected CIN3 lesions were smaller than cytology-detected ones (5.9 vs. 6.4 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Long-term analysis showed a borderline downward trend in invasive cancer for OgS (<i>p</i> = 0.089), whereas OpS remained stable at higher risk levels. Multivariate analysis confirmed the screening model as an independent predictor of invasiveness: OpS was associated with a two-fold increased risk of invasive cancer compared to OgS (adjusted odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.41-2.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: OgS identifies high-grade precancers earlier and with smaller excisional requirements. OpS is associated with significantly higher invasive cancer rates and larger conizations. Multivariate data reinforce OgS as a superior framework, effectively halving the risk of invasive disease compared to OpS.
Authors
- Niccolò Gallio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-1201)
- Federica Bevilacqua (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-3671)
- Mario Preti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-3114)
- Paola Garutti
- Camilla Cavallero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-6514)
- Ilaria Barbierato
- Alberto Revelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-3722)
- Luca Marozio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-5301)
- Fulvio Borella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-7557)
- Eleonora Robba
- Benedetta Pollano
- S Babich
- Ilaria Maschio
- Alessio Mastrippolito
- Pedro Vieira-Baptista
- Daniele Tota
- Lauro Bucchi
- Paola Armaroli
- Silvano Costa
- Federica Zamagni
- Samuel Joseph Gardner-Medwin
Institutions
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- University of Ferrara (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT)
- Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention (IT)
- Lusíada University of Porto (PT)
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2026-03-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16060839
- Primary Topic
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00