Opportunistic and Organized Cervical Cancer Screening: Impact on Lesion Severity and Surgical Outcomes in 9830 Cervical Conizations

<b>Objectives</b>: To assess the impact of organized (OgS) versus opportunistic screening (OpS) on grade, extent, and surgical management of cervical lesions, and to evaluate human papillomavirus (HPV)-based versus cytology-based screening within OgS. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzed 9830 women undergoing conization (1992-2021). Data included screening modality, histology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) linear extension, and cone volume. Statistical analysis employed chi-square test, Student's <i>t</i>-tests, Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and Firth's penalized multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of invasive disease. <b>Results</b>: Of 9830 patients, 5097 (52%) were referred from OgS and 4733 (48%) from OpS. OgS patients were significantly older (40.0 vs. 37.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the final decade, OgS achieved a significantly lower rate of invasive carcinomas compared to OpS (1.1% vs. 2.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean CIN3 extension and cone volume were significantly lower in OgS (6.5 mm; 1150 mm<sup>3</sup>) than in OpS (7.1 mm; 1580 mm<sup>3</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within OgS, HPV-detected CIN3 lesions were smaller than cytology-detected ones (5.9 vs. 6.4 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Long-term analysis showed a borderline downward trend in invasive cancer for OgS (<i>p</i> = 0.089), whereas OpS remained stable at higher risk levels. Multivariate analysis confirmed the screening model as an independent predictor of invasiveness: OpS was associated with a two-fold increased risk of invasive cancer compared to OgS (adjusted odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.41-2.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: OgS identifies high-grade precancers earlier and with smaller excisional requirements. OpS is associated with significantly higher invasive cancer rates and larger conizations. Multivariate data reinforce OgS as a superior framework, effectively halving the risk of invasive disease compared to OpS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16060839
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunistic and Organized Cervical Cancer Screening: Impact on Lesion Severity and Surgical Outcomes in 9830 Cervical Conizations

Niccolò Gallio, Federica Bevilacqua, Mario Preti, Paola Garutti et al.
Diagnostics
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Opportunistic and Organized Cervical Cancer Screening: Impact on Lesion Severity and Surgical Outcomes in 9830 Cervical Conizations

Niccolò Gallio, Federica Bevilacqua, Mario Preti, Paola Garutti, Camilla Cavallero, Ilaria Barbierato, Alberto Revelli, Luca Marozio, Fulvio Borella, Eleonora Robba, Benedetta Pollano, S Babich, Ilaria Maschio, Alessio Mastrippolito, Pedro Vieira-Baptista, Daniele Tota, Lauro Bucchi, Paola Armaroli, Silvano Costa, Federica Zamagni, Samuel Joseph Gardner-Medwin
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: To assess the impact of organized (OgS) versus opportunistic screening (OpS) on grade, extent, and surgical management of cervical lesions, and to evaluate human papillomavirus (HPV)-based versus cytology-based screening within OgS. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzed 9830 women undergoing conization (1992-2021). Data included screening modality, histology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) linear extension, and cone volume. Statistical analysis employed chi-square test, Student's <i>t</i>-tests, Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and Firth's penalized multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of invasive disease. <b>Results</b>: Of 9830 patients, 5097 (52%) were referred from OgS and 4733 (48%) from OpS. OgS patients were significantly older (40.0 vs. 37.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the final decade, OgS achieved a significantly lower rate of invasive carcinomas compared to OpS (1.1% vs. 2.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean CIN3 extension and cone volume were significantly lower in OgS (6.5 mm; 1150 mm<sup>3</sup>) than in OpS (7.1 mm; 1580 mm<sup>3</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within OgS, HPV-detected CIN3 lesions were smaller than cytology-detected ones (5.9 vs. 6.4 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Long-term analysis showed a borderline downward trend in invasive cancer for OgS (<i>p</i> = 0.089), whereas OpS remained stable at higher risk levels. Multivariate analysis confirmed the screening model as an independent predictor of invasiveness: OpS was associated with a two-fold increased risk of invasive cancer compared to OgS (adjusted odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.41-2.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: OgS identifies high-grade precancers earlier and with smaller excisional requirements. OpS is associated with significantly higher invasive cancer rates and larger conizations. Multivariate data reinforce OgS as a superior framework, effectively halving the risk of invasive disease compared to OpS.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(6)
Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Ferrara (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention (IT), Lusíada University of Porto (PT), Azienda Usl Toscana Centro (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.