Discriminating Vibrotactile Signals: The Relative Roles of Amplitude and Frequency

Vibrotactile interfaces commonly encode information using changes in stimulus amplitude and frequency, yet it remains unclear how reliably these parameters can be distinguished when spatial cues are unavailable. The present study examined discrimination of vibrotactile signals that differed in amplitude, frequency, or both, with sequential stimulation delivered to a single location on the wrist. Vibrotactile stimuli were presented through a wearable actuator, and participants judged whether pairs of signals were the same or different. Discrimination performance was high when stimuli differed in amplitude, whereas signals differing only in frequency were difficult to distinguish and often produced performance near chance. Importantly, adding frequency differences to amplitude differences did not improve discrimination beyond amplitude differences alone. These findings indicate that, under non-spatial and sequential presentation conditions, amplitude provides a robust cue for vibrotactile signal discrimination, whereas frequency modulations on their own offer limited benefits for perceptual discrimination. The results highlight basic constraints on vibrotactile perception that are relevant for the design of wearable tactile interfaces and sensory substitution devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actuators
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/act15030164
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discriminating Vibrotactile Signals: The Relative Roles of Amplitude and Frequency

Ivan Makarov, Runar Unnthorsson, Árni Kristjánsson
Actuators
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Discriminating Vibrotactile Signals: The Relative Roles of Amplitude and Frequency

Ivan Makarov, Runar Unnthorsson, Árni Kristjánsson
article en

Abstract

Vibrotactile interfaces commonly encode information using changes in stimulus amplitude and frequency, yet it remains unclear how reliably these parameters can be distinguished when spatial cues are unavailable. The present study examined discrimination of vibrotactile signals that differed in amplitude, frequency, or both, with sequential stimulation delivered to a single location on the wrist. Vibrotactile stimuli were presented through a wearable actuator, and participants judged whether pairs of signals were the same or different. Discrimination performance was high when stimuli differed in amplitude, whereas signals differing only in frequency were difficult to distinguish and often produced performance near chance. Importantly, adding frequency differences to amplitude differences did not improve discrimination beyond amplitude differences alone. These findings indicate that, under non-spatial and sequential presentation conditions, amplitude provides a robust cue for vibrotactile signal discrimination, whereas frequency modulations on their own offer limited benefits for perceptual discrimination. The results highlight basic constraints on vibrotactile perception that are relevant for the design of wearable tactile interfaces and sensory substitution devices.

ActuatorsVol. 15(3)
University of Iceland (IS)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discriminating Vibrotactile Signals: The Relative Roles of Amplitude and Frequency — Ivan Makarov, Runar Unnthorsson, et al. · Actuators (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS