Subversive Interpellations and Sexual Subjectivity Among Heterosexual Black Women

This paper asks: What kinds of interactions do heterosexual Black women experience along their sexual journeys? And how do these interactions impact their sexual subjectivities? Analysis of intimate life history interviews with Black heterosexual cisgender women ( n = 31), ages 34 to 58, indicates that they experienced hegemonic interpellations and subversive interpellations. Hegemonic interpellations describe interactions in which the women’s sexualities were misrecognized as deviant or exploitable. These interactions constrained their sexual subjectivities. This article introduces the concept subversive interpellations to describe interactions in which the women’s sexualities were recognized as acceptable, worth nurturing, or worth knowing. These interactions expanded the women’s sexual subjectivities. Findings suggest that sexual subjectivity is an interactional process shaped by structural racism, sexism, and heteronormativity. Ultimately, the paper argues that subversive interpellations are an important way that people undermine the social order in interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30333717261425254
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subversive Interpellations and Sexual Subjectivity Among Heterosexual Black Women

Maya C. Glenn-Hunt
Sex & Sexualities
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Subversive Interpellations and Sexual Subjectivity Among Heterosexual Black Women

Maya C. Glenn-Hunt
article en

Abstract

This paper asks: What kinds of interactions do heterosexual Black women experience along their sexual journeys? And how do these interactions impact their sexual subjectivities? Analysis of intimate life history interviews with Black heterosexual cisgender women ( n = 31), ages 34 to 58, indicates that they experienced hegemonic interpellations and subversive interpellations. Hegemonic interpellations describe interactions in which the women’s sexualities were misrecognized as deviant or exploitable. These interactions constrained their sexual subjectivities. This article introduces the concept subversive interpellations to describe interactions in which the women’s sexualities were recognized as acceptable, worth nurturing, or worth knowing. These interactions expanded the women’s sexual subjectivities. Findings suggest that sexual subjectivity is an interactional process shaped by structural racism, sexism, and heteronormativity. Ultimately, the paper argues that subversive interpellations are an important way that people undermine the social order in interaction.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 2(1)
University of Michigan (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.