Local Magnitude (ML) Calibration in the Short-Distance Range—The Case of the Collalto Seismic Network and Surrounding Stations in Northeastern Italy

ABSTRACT We calibrate local magnitude equations for northeastern Italy, centered on the Collalto seismic network, using the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior (IASPEI) parametric formulation and a modified approach from Chovanová and Kristek (2018). Our goal is to develop an ML distance correction well constrained at short distances, adhering to the Richter definition. Using digital data from 2012 to 2023, we find initial parameters similar to those obtained by Bragato and Tento (2005) on an independent dataset. These values differ significantly from the literature, but their physical meaning is questionable. We then introduce an additional procedural step to reduce the bias likely caused by data oversampling in the 10–40 km range. The resulting equations are MLH=LogAH−(−1.545Log(R/100)+0.001357(R−100)−3+SiH) and MLV=LogAV+0.238−(−1.555Log(R/100)+0.000995(R−100)−3+SiV) for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively; the Si represent static corrections for each station and instrumentation configuration. Our new scale is valid for distances 7–200 km and magnitudes from −0.8 to 5.8. It aligns pretty well with the Hutton and Boore (1987) equation from 15 to 160 km, despite the different coefficients; below 50 km distance, where it is best constrained, it generally provides higher values than the other Italian laws and laws tuned for the shortest distances. Average residuals reveal a ± 0.1 perturbation between 40 and 170 km, closely matching a pattern found by Bragato and Tento as well. Our findings highlight the critical impact of distance oversampling and confirm a regional perturbation of wave propagation that affects the Wood–Anderson amplitudes. Our scale aligns linearly with independently calculated Mw and shows to be reliable for the investigated magnitude range across the whole regional area. Thus, it is usable by both local and regional networks in all of northeastern Italy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250059
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Magnitude (ML) Calibration in the Short-Distance Range—The Case of the Collalto Seismic Network and Surrounding Stations in Northeastern Italy

Laura Peruzza, Enrico Priolo, Maria Adelaide Romano
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
High-pressure geophysics and materials
article

Local Magnitude (ML) Calibration in the Short-Distance Range—The Case of the Collalto Seismic Network and Surrounding Stations in Northeastern Italy

Laura Peruzza, Enrico Priolo, Maria Adelaide Romano
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We calibrate local magnitude equations for northeastern Italy, centered on the Collalto seismic network, using the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior (IASPEI) parametric formulation and a modified approach from Chovanová and Kristek (2018). Our goal is to develop an ML distance correction well constrained at short distances, adhering to the Richter definition. Using digital data from 2012 to 2023, we find initial parameters similar to those obtained by Bragato and Tento (2005) on an independent dataset. These values differ significantly from the literature, but their physical meaning is questionable. We then introduce an additional procedural step to reduce the bias likely caused by data oversampling in the 10–40 km range. The resulting equations are MLH=LogAH−(−1.545Log(R/100)+0.001357(R−100)−3+SiH) and MLV=LogAV+0.238−(−1.555Log(R/100)+0.000995(R−100)−3+SiV) for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively; the Si represent static corrections for each station and instrumentation configuration. Our new scale is valid for distances 7–200 km and magnitudes from −0.8 to 5.8. It aligns pretty well with the Hutton and Boore (1987) equation from 15 to 160 km, despite the different coefficients; below 50 km distance, where it is best constrained, it generally provides higher values than the other Italian laws and laws tuned for the shortest distances. Average residuals reveal a ± 0.1 perturbation between 40 and 170 km, closely matching a pattern found by Bragato and Tento as well. Our findings highlight the critical impact of distance oversampling and confirm a regional perturbation of wave propagation that affects the Wood–Anderson amplitudes. Our scale aligns linearly with independently calculated Mw and shows to be reliable for the investigated magnitude range across the whole regional area. Thus, it is usable by both local and regional networks in all of northeastern Italy.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.