Not all algorithmic controls are equal: the double-edged impact of algorithmic control dimensions on mental health and risky riding behavior among food delivery riders

Abstract Online labor platforms rely on big data-driven algorithms to implement precise, immediate, and fine-grained control over the labor service process of food delivery riders, called algorithmic control. While algorithmic control enhances the overall efficiency of platform-based organizations, it also exerts multiple psychological and behavioral impacts on food delivery riders, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study subdivided the three dimensions of perceived algorithmic control (i.e., tracking evaluation, behavioral constraint, and standardized guidance), and considered work pressure as a mediator based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, in order to explore whether and how perceived algorithmic control affects the mental health and risky riding behavior of food delivery riders. The study also investigates the moderating role of perceived autonomy. Data from 466 Chinese food delivery riders were analyzed using a structural equation model and bootstrapping procedure. The results showed that both perceived algorithmic tracking evaluation and behavioral constraint impaired riders’ mental health and promoted risky riding behavior through work pressure, while perceived algorithmic standardized guidance improved their mental health and reduced risky riding behavior through work pressure. Perceived autonomy mitigates the negative effects of algorithmic tracking evaluation and enhances the positive effects of algorithmic standardized guidance, but it amplifies the negative effects of algorithmic behavioral constraint. These findings provide a clear explanation for understanding the “double-edged sword” effect of perceived algorithmic control on the food delivery riders’ psychology and behavior, which not only enriches the research on algorithmic control in the context of the gig economy, but also sheds light on the managerial practices of platform-based organizations to improve their algorithmic systems and enhance the sustainable development of gig workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06909-6
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all algorithmic controls are equal: the double-edged impact of algorithmic control dimensions on mental health and risky riding behavior among food delivery riders

Wenpei Zhang, Juan Qi, Jinnan Wu, Wenqian Yang
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Not all algorithmic controls are equal: the double-edged impact of algorithmic control dimensions on mental health and risky riding behavior among food delivery riders

Wenpei Zhang, Juan Qi, Jinnan Wu, Wenqian Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Online labor platforms rely on big data-driven algorithms to implement precise, immediate, and fine-grained control over the labor service process of food delivery riders, called algorithmic control. While algorithmic control enhances the overall efficiency of platform-based organizations, it also exerts multiple psychological and behavioral impacts on food delivery riders, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study subdivided the three dimensions of perceived algorithmic control (i.e., tracking evaluation, behavioral constraint, and standardized guidance), and considered work pressure as a mediator based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, in order to explore whether and how perceived algorithmic control affects the mental health and risky riding behavior of food delivery riders. The study also investigates the moderating role of perceived autonomy. Data from 466 Chinese food delivery riders were analyzed using a structural equation model and bootstrapping procedure. The results showed that both perceived algorithmic tracking evaluation and behavioral constraint impaired riders’ mental health and promoted risky riding behavior through work pressure, while perceived algorithmic standardized guidance improved their mental health and reduced risky riding behavior through work pressure. Perceived autonomy mitigates the negative effects of algorithmic tracking evaluation and enhances the positive effects of algorithmic standardized guidance, but it amplifies the negative effects of algorithmic behavioral constraint. These findings provide a clear explanation for understanding the “double-edged sword” effect of perceived algorithmic control on the food delivery riders’ psychology and behavior, which not only enriches the research on algorithmic control in the context of the gig economy, but also sheds light on the managerial practices of platform-based organizations to improve their algorithmic systems and enhance the sustainable development of gig workers.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Anhui University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.