Evaluating creative practice research: A new framework

It has been widely noted that creative practice research agitates in positive ways certain attitudes, understandings and/or practices towards ‘knowledge’ and ‘research’ within the university context. Not only this, or partly because of this, creative practice research complicates established scholarly protocols of assessment and evaluation. This has been a topic of concern and debate for the field for the past 30 years (since the emergence of the field as such). This research was conducted in the Australian context where the government research evaluation program has been under review since 2021. The Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts (DDCA) felt a duty to step into this context and facilitate a sector-wide series of activities that would address the main issues for the field. This was done with the view to writing a set of key recommendations pertinent to the sector which would enable a new and fit-for-purpose approach to creative practice research assessment and evaluation. This article details the seven key recommendations that resulted from these activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222261432260
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating creative practice research: A new framework

Craig Batty, Smiljana Glišović
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Artistic and Creative Research
article

Evaluating creative practice research: A new framework

Craig Batty, Smiljana Glišović
article en

Abstract

It has been widely noted that creative practice research agitates in positive ways certain attitudes, understandings and/or practices towards ‘knowledge’ and ‘research’ within the university context. Not only this, or partly because of this, creative practice research complicates established scholarly protocols of assessment and evaluation. This has been a topic of concern and debate for the field for the past 30 years (since the emergence of the field as such). This research was conducted in the Australian context where the government research evaluation program has been under review since 2021. The Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts (DDCA) felt a duty to step into this context and facilitate a sector-wide series of activities that would address the main issues for the field. This was done with the view to writing a set of key recommendations pertinent to the sector which would enable a new and fit-for-purpose approach to creative practice research assessment and evaluation. This article details the seven key recommendations that resulted from these activities.

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.