Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective

The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion remains challenging. Microbiological and cytopathological examinations are considered the gold standards; however, they are limited by their low sensitivity, subjectivity, invasiveness, and prolonged turnaround times. Pleural fluid and serum biochemical tests offer the advantages of objectivity, short turnaround time, minimal invasiveness, and easy accessibility, which can help pulmonologists estimate the risk of the target disease. However, their effectiveness is often suboptimal when they are used alone. Recent advances suggest that machine learning (ML) algorithms can enhance diagnostic accuracy when combined with multiple parameters. Several studies have applied ML approaches based on biochemical tests to diagnose pleural effusion, with preliminary results indicating an improved diagnostic performance. This article reviews the application of such algorithms in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion, highlights their current limitations, and provides recommendations for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01448-2025
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective

Runjiao Bao, Jose Porcel, Li Yan, Yanan Xu et al.
ERJ Open Research
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective

Runjiao Bao, Jose Porcel, Li Yan, Yanan Xu, Wen-Qi Zheng, Zhi-De Hu, Wen-Jie Hou, Xu-Lei Hao
article en

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion remains challenging. Microbiological and cytopathological examinations are considered the gold standards; however, they are limited by their low sensitivity, subjectivity, invasiveness, and prolonged turnaround times. Pleural fluid and serum biochemical tests offer the advantages of objectivity, short turnaround time, minimal invasiveness, and easy accessibility, which can help pulmonologists estimate the risk of the target disease. However, their effectiveness is often suboptimal when they are used alone. Recent advances suggest that machine learning (ML) algorithms can enhance diagnostic accuracy when combined with multiple parameters. Several studies have applied ML approaches based on biochemical tests to diagnose pleural effusion, with preliminary results indicating an improved diagnostic performance. This article reviews the application of such algorithms in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion, highlights their current limitations, and provides recommendations for future research.

ERJ Open Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective — Runjiao Bao, Jose Porcel, et al. · ERJ Open Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS