Comparative Study on Residual Capacity of Fire-Damaged Rectangular and T-Shaped Concrete Beams

In this study, the comparative residual performance of fire-exposed reinforced concrete (RC) beams with rectangular and T-shaped cross-sections is investigated. Two concrete beams, one with a T-section and the other with a rectangular section, were tested under the combined effects of fire exposure and structural loading. Data generated in the tests during and following fire exposure is utilized to compare the thermal and structural response of the beams. The results indicate a notable difference in the temperature evolution, mid-span deflection, and the residual capacity of the beams. The T-beam experienced greater deflection and stiffness degradation due to its larger exposed surface area (approximately 17% higher than the rectangular beam) and flange geometry, despite comparable peak rebar temperatures. A simplified approach, based on the maximum concrete and rebar temperatures and corresponding strength reductions, is proposed to evaluate the residual capacity of fire-exposed RC beams. For equal cover depth to reinforcement, peak rebar temperature is unaffected by cross-section shape as long as the web of the T-beam is not slender. T-shaped beams with similar overall depth exhibit greater post-fire strength retention than rectangular beams when the neutral axis lies within the flange. A 20% reduction in the web thickness and a combined reduction of 20% in web and 37% in flange thickness result in a comparable decrease in the flexural capacity to that of the rectangular beams of similar depth, indicating that the flange plays a key role in maintaining post-fire performance.