The influence of farm type on antimicrobial use in dairy cattle and finisher pigs: A comparative study based on Swiss reporting data

Given the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance to human health, the frequent antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock remains a topic of serious debate. The identification of AMU-increasing factors is crucial to implement effective measures to reduce overall AMU in livestock. This study used data from the Swiss reporting system to estimate AMU in dairy cattle and finisher pigs, comparing AMU between specialized farms housing either one production category or mixed farms housing both species alongside. Treatment incidence (TI) was calculated based on defined daily doses (DDD) at the farm level (_F) and the population level for each farm type (P_). For dairy farms, we estimated a median TI_F of 4.9 DDD/cow/year and TI_P of 5.8 DDD/cow/year. For dairy cattle on mixed farms, the median TI_F was 5.6 DDD/cow/year and TI_P was 6.4 DDD/cow/year. For finisher farms, we estimated a median TI_F of 0.1 DDD/finisher/year and TI_P of 1.0 DDD/finisher/year. For finisher pigs on mixed farms, the median TI_F was 0.0 DDD/finisher/year and TI_P was 0.4 DDD/finisher/year. This study revealed that mixed farms had a significantly higher AMU for dairy cattle and a significantly lower AMU for finisher pigs compared to the specialized single-species farms. The herd sizes did not correlate with the AMU levels on the farms, and there were no substantial differences in herd size between the different farm types. This suggests that the species housed on the farm and associated management practices, such as animal monitoring, may significantly influence AMU. However, due to the lack of information about farm-level management and husbandry practices, the specific causes for differences in AMU remain speculative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.106850
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of farm type on antimicrobial use in dairy cattle and finisher pigs: A comparative study based on Swiss reporting data

Dolf Kümmerlen, Lena Fleischer, Jens Becker
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

The influence of farm type on antimicrobial use in dairy cattle and finisher pigs: A comparative study based on Swiss reporting data

Dolf Kümmerlen, Lena Fleischer, Jens Becker
article en

Abstract

Given the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance to human health, the frequent antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock remains a topic of serious debate. The identification of AMU-increasing factors is crucial to implement effective measures to reduce overall AMU in livestock. This study used data from the Swiss reporting system to estimate AMU in dairy cattle and finisher pigs, comparing AMU between specialized farms housing either one production category or mixed farms housing both species alongside. Treatment incidence (TI) was calculated based on defined daily doses (DDD) at the farm level (_F) and the population level for each farm type (P_). For dairy farms, we estimated a median TI_F of 4.9 DDD/cow/year and TI_P of 5.8 DDD/cow/year. For dairy cattle on mixed farms, the median TI_F was 5.6 DDD/cow/year and TI_P was 6.4 DDD/cow/year. For finisher farms, we estimated a median TI_F of 0.1 DDD/finisher/year and TI_P of 1.0 DDD/finisher/year. For finisher pigs on mixed farms, the median TI_F was 0.0 DDD/finisher/year and TI_P was 0.4 DDD/finisher/year. This study revealed that mixed farms had a significantly higher AMU for dairy cattle and a significantly lower AMU for finisher pigs compared to the specialized single-species farms. The herd sizes did not correlate with the AMU levels on the farms, and there were no substantial differences in herd size between the different farm types. This suggests that the species housed on the farm and associated management practices, such as animal monitoring, may significantly influence AMU. However, due to the lack of information about farm-level management and husbandry practices, the specific causes for differences in AMU remain speculative.

Preventive Veterinary MedicineVol. 251
University of Bern (CH), University of Zurich (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.