Designing a colorectal cancer screening program for community pharmacies: Findings from a national survey of pharmacists

BackgroundPharmacies could play a key role in distributing fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assessed pharmacists’ preferences for implementing a pharmacy-based FIT program (PharmFITTM).MethodsFrom 9/2022 to 1/2023, we conducted a national online survey of 578 pharmacists (response rate 59%). Descriptive statistics characterized preferred PharmFITTM design features, and logistic regression identified correlates associated with perceived difficulty identifying FIT-eligible patients.ResultsMost pharmacists preferred physicians to inform patients about CRC screening eligibility and to communicate positive FIT results, including referral for colonoscopy. Pharmacists favored in-person FIT distribution, provision of written information, and brief counseling at the pharmacy, and supported patients mailing completed FITs directly to laboratories. Staff pharmacists and those in independent, regional chain, or supermarket pharmacies were more likely to perceive it to be difficult to identify FIT-eligible patients. Lower perceived PharmFITTM complexity, more years of experience, and advanced credentials were associated with less perceived difficulty.ConclusionsPharmacists support PharmFITTM and endorse clear physician– pharmacy role delineation, in-person FIT distribution, and direct mailing of completed FITs to laboratories. Pharmacy structure and pharmacists’ experience and training should inform PharmFITTM design and implementation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28322134.2026.2636343
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing a colorectal cancer screening program for community pharmacies: Findings from a national survey of pharmacists

Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi, Macary Weck Marciniak, Parth D. Shah, Austin R. Waters et al.
Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Designing a colorectal cancer screening program for community pharmacies: Findings from a national survey of pharmacists

Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi, Macary Weck Marciniak, Parth D. Shah, Austin R. Waters, SB Wheeler, Alison T. Brenner, Renée Ferrari, Mary Wangen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPharmacies could play a key role in distributing fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assessed pharmacists’ preferences for implementing a pharmacy-based FIT program (PharmFITTM).MethodsFrom 9/2022 to 1/2023, we conducted a national online survey of 578 pharmacists (response rate 59%). Descriptive statistics characterized preferred PharmFITTM design features, and logistic regression identified correlates associated with perceived difficulty identifying FIT-eligible patients.ResultsMost pharmacists preferred physicians to inform patients about CRC screening eligibility and to communicate positive FIT results, including referral for colonoscopy. Pharmacists favored in-person FIT distribution, provision of written information, and brief counseling at the pharmacy, and supported patients mailing completed FITs directly to laboratories. Staff pharmacists and those in independent, regional chain, or supermarket pharmacies were more likely to perceive it to be difficult to identify FIT-eligible patients. Lower perceived PharmFITTM complexity, more years of experience, and advanced credentials were associated with less perceived difficulty.ConclusionsPharmacists support PharmFITTM and endorse clear physician– pharmacy role delineation, in-person FIT distribution, and direct mailing of completed FITs to laboratories. Pharmacy structure and pharmacists’ experience and training should inform PharmFITTM design and implementation strategies.

Preventive Oncology & EpidemiologyVol. 4(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.