The Tale of Tail Dependence: Modeling height–diameter relationships with elliptical copulas

Modeling height–diameter ( H – D ) relationships is fundamental to forest management. Copula could be used to simulate H – D distributions that mirror the underlying dependence structures of an observed relationship. Tail dependence measures the co-movements of extreme events. It is an intrinsic property of a copula, but it has rarely been examined in forestry studies that applied a copula. The overall goal of this paper was to introduce tail dependence in H – D modeling using a small dataset of two species groups and the elliptical copulas (Normal and t copula). The H – D observations were first transformed into pseudo-observations by ranking, which were used to compute tail dependence. Elliptical copulas were fitted and used to simulate distributions of pseudo-observations. The simulated pseudo-observations were transformed into simulated H – D distributions by the fitted marginals. Results showed that the empirical tail dependence of the two species groups was asymmetrical, more variable in the lower tail, but more similar in the upper tail. The elliptical copulas failed to capture the asymmetric empirical tail dependence because of the symmetry imposed by the copulas. This led to inadequate representation of the simulated H – D distributions to the observed ones by producing extreme outliers that were not biologically meaningful. For example, the Normal copula simulated H – D pairs with D ≤ 2 cm but H up to 18 m for one species group. Our assessments of the lack of fit of the elliptical copulas are made possible by studying the distributions of pseudo-observations and computing tail dependence. They unravel dependence structures that are not immediately apparent in the corresponding H – D relationships. Lastly, we recommend future studies to consider reporting pseudo-observations and tail dependence and to explore alternative copulas that accommodate asymmetric tail dependence. • Tail dependence is intrinsic to copula modeling but has been largely ignored in forestry research • Empirical tail dependence of observed H-D relationships can be asymmetrical, more variable in the lower tail, but more similar in the upper tail. • The elliptical copulas failed to simulate representative H-D distributions due to symmetric theoretical tail dependence. • The elliptical copulas could not simulate strong co-movement in the lower tail of a species group and generated extreme outliers for another species group that are not biologically meaningful. • We suggest future studies applying copula to consider reporting pseudo-observations and tail dependence and moving beyond elliptical copulas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecosystems
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2026.100454
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Tale of Tail Dependence: Modeling height–diameter relationships with elliptical copulas

Tzeng Yih Lam
Forest Ecosystems
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
article

The Tale of Tail Dependence: Modeling height–diameter relationships with elliptical copulas

Tzeng Yih Lam
article en

Abstract

Modeling height–diameter ( H – D ) relationships is fundamental to forest management. Copula could be used to simulate H – D distributions that mirror the underlying dependence structures of an observed relationship. Tail dependence measures the co-movements of extreme events. It is an intrinsic property of a copula, but it has rarely been examined in forestry studies that applied a copula. The overall goal of this paper was to introduce tail dependence in H – D modeling using a small dataset of two species groups and the elliptical copulas (Normal and t copula). The H – D observations were first transformed into pseudo-observations by ranking, which were used to compute tail dependence. Elliptical copulas were fitted and used to simulate distributions of pseudo-observations. The simulated pseudo-observations were transformed into simulated H – D distributions by the fitted marginals. Results showed that the empirical tail dependence of the two species groups was asymmetrical, more variable in the lower tail, but more similar in the upper tail. The elliptical copulas failed to capture the asymmetric empirical tail dependence because of the symmetry imposed by the copulas. This led to inadequate representation of the simulated H – D distributions to the observed ones by producing extreme outliers that were not biologically meaningful. For example, the Normal copula simulated H – D pairs with D ≤ 2 cm but H up to 18 m for one species group. Our assessments of the lack of fit of the elliptical copulas are made possible by studying the distributions of pseudo-observations and computing tail dependence. They unravel dependence structures that are not immediately apparent in the corresponding H – D relationships. Lastly, we recommend future studies to consider reporting pseudo-observations and tail dependence and to explore alternative copulas that accommodate asymmetric tail dependence. • Tail dependence is intrinsic to copula modeling but has been largely ignored in forestry research • Empirical tail dependence of observed H-D relationships can be asymmetrical, more variable in the lower tail, but more similar in the upper tail. • The elliptical copulas failed to simulate representative H-D distributions due to symmetric theoretical tail dependence. • The elliptical copulas could not simulate strong co-movement in the lower tail of a species group and generated extreme outliers for another species group that are not biologically meaningful. • We suggest future studies applying copula to consider reporting pseudo-observations and tail dependence and moving beyond elliptical copulas.

Forest EcosystemsVol. 16
University of British Columbia (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.