Construction and validation of the Emotional Trust in Artificial Intelligence Scale (CEIA)

Background Emotional trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a crucial component of human-AI interaction, especially in academia, where generative systems are used for academic, communicational, and socio-emotional purposes. While research has advanced in cognitive trust, there is a lack of validated instruments that rigorously assess the affective dimension of trust, which involves processes of perceived authenticity, emotional validation, affective recognition, and the establishment of symbolic bonds with artificial agents. Objective To develop and psychometrically validate the Emotional Confidence in Artificial Intelligence Scale (CEIA) in university students, examining its factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as its measurement invariance by sex. Methods Six hundred and fibe Peruvian university students, aged 16 to 88 years (M = 22.93, SD = 7.35), participated in the study. Item distributions, item-total correlations, and descriptive statistics were analyzed. Internal structure was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with polychoric correlations and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Convergent and discriminant validity were examined using AVE, CR, and HTMT. Sex invariance was assessed using multigroup CFA with the WLSMV estimator. Results The EFA supported a multidimensional structure consistent with the theoretical model. The CFA confirmed a four-factor solution—Perceived Authenticity, Emotional Validation, Affective Recognition, and Symbolic Bonding—with adequate fit indices (CFI = 0.944; TLI = 0.937; RMSEA = 0.073; SRMR = 0.033). The dimensions showed high internal consistency (α = 0.91–0.94; ω = 0.91–0.94) and satisfactory evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Invariance analysis demonstrated metric invariance and partial scalar invariance between men and women. Conclusion The CEIA is a valid, reliable, and partially sex-invariant instrument for assessing emotional trust in AI among university students. It constitutes a robust tool for research, technological design, and the ethical development of AI systems with affective capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1755160
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction and validation of the Emotional Trust in Artificial Intelligence Scale (CEIA)

Josue Edison Turpo-Chaparro, Roberto Estrada-Medina, Berle Estalin Briones-Llamoctanta, Ronald Garnique Hinostroza
Frontiers in Psychology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Construction and validation of the Emotional Trust in Artificial Intelligence Scale (CEIA)

Josue Edison Turpo-Chaparro, Roberto Estrada-Medina, Berle Estalin Briones-Llamoctanta, Ronald Garnique Hinostroza
article en

Abstract

Background Emotional trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a crucial component of human-AI interaction, especially in academia, where generative systems are used for academic, communicational, and socio-emotional purposes. While research has advanced in cognitive trust, there is a lack of validated instruments that rigorously assess the affective dimension of trust, which involves processes of perceived authenticity, emotional validation, affective recognition, and the establishment of symbolic bonds with artificial agents. Objective To develop and psychometrically validate the Emotional Confidence in Artificial Intelligence Scale (CEIA) in university students, examining its factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as its measurement invariance by sex. Methods Six hundred and fibe Peruvian university students, aged 16 to 88 years (M = 22.93, SD = 7.35), participated in the study. Item distributions, item-total correlations, and descriptive statistics were analyzed. Internal structure was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with polychoric correlations and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Convergent and discriminant validity were examined using AVE, CR, and HTMT. Sex invariance was assessed using multigroup CFA with the WLSMV estimator. Results The EFA supported a multidimensional structure consistent with the theoretical model. The CFA confirmed a four-factor solution—Perceived Authenticity, Emotional Validation, Affective Recognition, and Symbolic Bonding—with adequate fit indices (CFI = 0.944; TLI = 0.937; RMSEA = 0.073; SRMR = 0.033). The dimensions showed high internal consistency (α = 0.91–0.94; ω = 0.91–0.94) and satisfactory evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Invariance analysis demonstrated metric invariance and partial scalar invariance between men and women. Conclusion The CEIA is a valid, reliable, and partially sex-invariant instrument for assessing emotional trust in AI among university students. It constitutes a robust tool for research, technological design, and the ethical development of AI systems with affective capabilities.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Universidad Peruana Unión (PE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.