Breathing New Life Into Critical Care Nutrition: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Implementation of Routine Use of Indirect Calorimetry

Background: Indirect calorimetry (IC) accurately measures a patient’s metabolic rate and energy needs, guiding nutrition support for critically ill patients. The American Society of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommends IC for accurate calorie prescriptions. While estimations based on weight or equations exist, they are unreliable due to patient variations and can lead to over- or underfeeding, both harmful. Our study (Jan 2020 - Dec 2022) found low use of IC for critical patients (only 11 cases). The barriers were faulty equipment, doubts about IC’s value, outdated procedures, and training gaps. An interdisciplinary team was formed in January 2023 to address these issues and optimize nutrition support using IC. Methods: UCSF’s IC task force addressed low utilization. Staff evaluated new metabolic carts (Q-NRG and the CCM express) for user experience, accuracy, and cost. A purchase request is awaiting delivery. Policies were updated for accurate IC implementation, including patient selection and data interpretation. A screening method and IC study process were developed. Educational sessions empowered multidisciplinary teams on IC benefits and its use. While a new cart is awaited, updated procedures and trained staff ensure optimal use when available. Results: IC use increased for critically ill patients. RD estimates vs. IC measurements showed poor agreement. In 81% of patients, IC resulted in adjustments to nutrition prescriptions. Based on measured REE, there were underfeeding (50%) and overfeeding (31%) cases. Summary of the findings about kcal/day needs: Estimated vs. measured kcal/day agreed within 10% for only 19% of patients. The mean difference between estimated and measured kcal/day was 497 kcal. A wide range of kcal/kg needs were observed: 19-49 kcal/kg for BMI < 30 (n = 28), 27-35 kcal/kg for BMI > 30 (n = 4). Conclusions: Despite challenges, IC use has increased at UCSF in 2023 and 2024. It has led to nutrition prescription adjustments for 81% of measured patients, highlighting the importance of IC in providing accurate and individualized care. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration and access to a reliable metabolic cart are essential to maintaining this trend and establishing IC as a standard of care when providing nutrition support interventions for critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244138137
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breathing New Life Into Critical Care Nutrition: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Implementation of Routine Use of Indirect Calorimetry

Denise Calvo Marasigan, Ashtyn Cleveland, Gregory D Burns, Emily Brumsted et al.
Respiratory Care
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Breathing New Life Into Critical Care Nutrition: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Implementation of Routine Use of Indirect Calorimetry

Denise Calvo Marasigan, Ashtyn Cleveland, Gregory D Burns, Emily Brumsted, Amber Antonopoulos
article en

Abstract

Background: Indirect calorimetry (IC) accurately measures a patient’s metabolic rate and energy needs, guiding nutrition support for critically ill patients. The American Society of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommends IC for accurate calorie prescriptions. While estimations based on weight or equations exist, they are unreliable due to patient variations and can lead to over- or underfeeding, both harmful. Our study (Jan 2020 - Dec 2022) found low use of IC for critical patients (only 11 cases). The barriers were faulty equipment, doubts about IC’s value, outdated procedures, and training gaps. An interdisciplinary team was formed in January 2023 to address these issues and optimize nutrition support using IC. Methods: UCSF’s IC task force addressed low utilization. Staff evaluated new metabolic carts (Q-NRG and the CCM express) for user experience, accuracy, and cost. A purchase request is awaiting delivery. Policies were updated for accurate IC implementation, including patient selection and data interpretation. A screening method and IC study process were developed. Educational sessions empowered multidisciplinary teams on IC benefits and its use. While a new cart is awaited, updated procedures and trained staff ensure optimal use when available. Results: IC use increased for critically ill patients. RD estimates vs. IC measurements showed poor agreement. In 81% of patients, IC resulted in adjustments to nutrition prescriptions. Based on measured REE, there were underfeeding (50%) and overfeeding (31%) cases. Summary of the findings about kcal/day needs: Estimated vs. measured kcal/day agreed within 10% for only 19% of patients. The mean difference between estimated and measured kcal/day was 497 kcal. A wide range of kcal/kg needs were observed: 19-49 kcal/kg for BMI < 30 (n = 28), 27-35 kcal/kg for BMI > 30 (n = 4). Conclusions: Despite challenges, IC use has increased at UCSF in 2023 and 2024. It has led to nutrition prescription adjustments for 81% of measured patients, highlighting the importance of IC in providing accurate and individualized care. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration and access to a reliable metabolic cart are essential to maintaining this trend and establishing IC as a standard of care when providing nutrition support interventions for critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
Food and Nutrition Service (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.