Consumer responses to GMO-related labeling in wine markets: evidence from an online choice experiment

Purpose GMO labeling is mandatory for many food products in the USA; however, alcoholic beverages are exempt from these regulations. As a result, some wine producers voluntarily adopt GMO-related labels as a differentiation strategy, yet the effects of such labeling on consumer behavior remain unclear. This study aims to examine how GMO and non-GMO wine labels influence consumer purchasing decisions. Design/methodology/approach An online discrete choice experiment was conducted with 1,306 participants to evaluate consumers’ willingness to buy wines under alternative labeling scenarios, allowing identification of both direct labeling effects and order-dependent responses. Findings The results reveal two main findings. First, GMO labels significantly reduce consumer demand for wine relative to unlabeled products, whereas non-GMO labels do not affect initial purchase likelihood. Second, exposure to non-GMO labels prior to unlabeled options reduces the willingness to buy of unlabeled wines by 8.5%, suggesting a stigmatization effect associated with voluntary labeling. Originality/value This study provides novel evidence on the effects of GMO-related labeling in the wine market, a product category largely excluded from mandatory labeling regulations. By identifying a stigmatization effect associated with voluntary non-GMO labeling, the findings offer policy-relevant insights into discussions surrounding the potential extension of GMO labeling requirements to alcoholic beverages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wine Business Research
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-11-2025-0078
Primary Topic
Wine Industry and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer responses to GMO-related labeling in wine markets: evidence from an online choice experiment

Praharsh M. Patel, Mingzhou Shen, Zekun Ma
International Journal of Wine Business Research
Wine Industry and Tourism
article

Consumer responses to GMO-related labeling in wine markets: evidence from an online choice experiment

Praharsh M. Patel, Mingzhou Shen, Zekun Ma
article en

Abstract

Purpose GMO labeling is mandatory for many food products in the USA; however, alcoholic beverages are exempt from these regulations. As a result, some wine producers voluntarily adopt GMO-related labels as a differentiation strategy, yet the effects of such labeling on consumer behavior remain unclear. This study aims to examine how GMO and non-GMO wine labels influence consumer purchasing decisions. Design/methodology/approach An online discrete choice experiment was conducted with 1,306 participants to evaluate consumers’ willingness to buy wines under alternative labeling scenarios, allowing identification of both direct labeling effects and order-dependent responses. Findings The results reveal two main findings. First, GMO labels significantly reduce consumer demand for wine relative to unlabeled products, whereas non-GMO labels do not affect initial purchase likelihood. Second, exposure to non-GMO labels prior to unlabeled options reduces the willingness to buy of unlabeled wines by 8.5%, suggesting a stigmatization effect associated with voluntary labeling. Originality/value This study provides novel evidence on the effects of GMO-related labeling in the wine market, a product category largely excluded from mandatory labeling regulations. By identifying a stigmatization effect associated with voluntary non-GMO labeling, the findings offer policy-relevant insights into discussions surrounding the potential extension of GMO labeling requirements to alcoholic beverages.

International Journal of Wine Business Research
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IN), EP Analytics (United States) (US), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Wine Industry and Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.