Framing early childhood AI literacy: What did the literature review tell us?

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates early childhood education, the field faces a critical challenge: the lack of a scientifically grounded framework for AI literacy. While numerous reviews have mapped what tools and pedagogies are currently used, few have examined why the field has developed in its current trajectory. This tertiary review systematically synthesizes 11 existing literature reviews to move beyond descriptive mapping toward a structural diagnosis of early childhood AI literacy. Our synthesis reveals a core consensus on definitions and identifies four major research themes (cognitive understanding, practical skills, ethics, and environmental support). However, a critical analysis uncovers a systemic Tool-Driven bias, where educational goals are often inadvertently defined by the capabilities of commercial hardware rather than by developmental needs. We argue that this bias triggers a ripple effect, leading to superficial assessments and a premature convergence on adult-centric, Western-biased models. To address these structural flaws, this paper proposes a dual-dimensional solution, namely, a “Developmental Translation” dimension to bridge the gap between complex AI mechanics and child psychology, and a “Socio-Cultural Adaptation” dimension to contextualize AI literacy within diverse local values and promote equity. We conclude by advocating for a paradigm shift from technology-centered implementation to child-centered, socially just AI education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Brain and Child
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-026-00028-4
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing early childhood AI literacy: What did the literature review tell us?

Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Ruiqi Wang, Xiang Li
AI Brain and Child
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Framing early childhood AI literacy: What did the literature review tell us?

Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Ruiqi Wang, Xiang Li
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates early childhood education, the field faces a critical challenge: the lack of a scientifically grounded framework for AI literacy. While numerous reviews have mapped what tools and pedagogies are currently used, few have examined why the field has developed in its current trajectory. This tertiary review systematically synthesizes 11 existing literature reviews to move beyond descriptive mapping toward a structural diagnosis of early childhood AI literacy. Our synthesis reveals a core consensus on definitions and identifies four major research themes (cognitive understanding, practical skills, ethics, and environmental support). However, a critical analysis uncovers a systemic Tool-Driven bias, where educational goals are often inadvertently defined by the capabilities of commercial hardware rather than by developmental needs. We argue that this bias triggers a ripple effect, leading to superficial assessments and a premature convergence on adult-centric, Western-biased models. To address these structural flaws, this paper proposes a dual-dimensional solution, namely, a “Developmental Translation” dimension to bridge the gap between complex AI mechanics and child psychology, and a “Socio-Cultural Adaptation” dimension to contextualize AI literacy within diverse local values and promote equity. We conclude by advocating for a paradigm shift from technology-centered implementation to child-centered, socially just AI education.

AI Brain and ChildVol. 2(1)
Civil Aviation University of China (CN), Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Education University of Hong Kong
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.