Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability

Authorship remains the primary currency of academic credit and a cornerstone of research integrity, yet current practices often fail to reflect the collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of modern science and questionable authorship practices persist. We argue that addressing these shortcomings is a collective responsibility shared by researchers, journals, research funders, scholarly societies, and research institutions. We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals and research institutions and found that their recommendations to researchers are highly variable. We propose that fostering a responsible authorship culture requires a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability. These three interconnected principles highlight when authorship practices are questionable and offer a framework for constructive reflection on the meaning of authorship. We outline practical ways research leaders can embed these principles into everyday practice by initiating early, inclusive, and fair authorship discussions and ensuring transparent description of contributions. Research institutions have a unique opportunity to inculcate good practices and lead this culture change with harmonized guidance, education, fair conflict resolution, and reform of researcher assessment. Anchoring authorship in transparency, credit, and accountability will strengthen the credibility of individual research, the fairness of recognition systems, and, ultimately, the trustworthiness of science itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2531268123
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
76.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability

Geeta Swamy, Joerg Heber, Magdalena Skipper, Kathleen Hall Jamieson et al.
3 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Academic integrity and plagiarism
76.96
article

Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability

Geeta Swamy, Joerg Heber, Magdalena Skipper, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Sofia Adams, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Yensi Flores Bueso, Susan M. Wolf, Beau Nielsen, Véronique Kiermer, Ana Marušić, Mohammad Hosseini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Authorship remains the primary currency of academic credit and a cornerstone of research integrity, yet current practices often fail to reflect the collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of modern science and questionable authorship practices persist. We argue that addressing these shortcomings is a collective responsibility shared by researchers, journals, research funders, scholarly societies, and research institutions. We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals and research institutions and found that their recommendations to researchers are highly variable. We propose that fostering a responsible authorship culture requires a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability. These three interconnected principles highlight when authorship practices are questionable and offer a framework for constructive reflection on the meaning of authorship. We outline practical ways research leaders can embed these principles into everyday practice by initiating early, inclusive, and fair authorship discussions and ensuring transparent description of contributions. Research institutions have a unique opportunity to inculcate good practices and lead this culture change with harmonized guidance, education, fair conflict resolution, and reform of researcher assessment. Anchoring authorship in transparency, credit, and accountability will strengthen the credibility of individual research, the fairness of recognition systems, and, ultimately, the trustworthiness of science itself.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(12)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Duke University (US), American Medical Association (US), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), University College Cork (IE), Institute for Biomedicine (IT), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
76.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.